Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rKarpinski
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
Honey, think about how much money the divorce will save us on tuition!
62.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
80% of American families... but what % of MIT students?
63.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
Plenty of people are surprised by the junk fee and end up eating it.
64.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
Don't sugar coat it, he would basically be ending the relationship. It will also force the roommate to figure out a new living situation on top of all the other things: Working on stabilizing, Hospital Bills, Job Loss, dealing with sha
65.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
If the situation remains in crisis I completely agree, I just think that may be a premature decision because the roommate has been successfully managing their issues and leading a normal life the last 5-10+ years.
66.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
If they've had a previous episode and have lived with you for 5 years without incident it sounds like they are able to successfully manage whatever underlying issues they have, with the exception of this acute episode. > I will like
67.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
> You can't run on that against a 4 star rear admiral who also went into space. He was a Captain [1]. And what on 'Earth'(!) is a "4 star rear admiral"? [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark
68.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
> It looks like Harris was was an ok candidate for the core democrat voter Thats very questionable, she was forced to drop out before the first Democratic primary for the 2020' nomination.
69.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
> It not even guaranteed that Trump will win the popular vote Well the odds are 1000:1 on Polymarket, so if it's at all possible that's a great bet!
70.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
true as it can be
71.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
Not just ad fraud but yes... Fake google accounts, fake reviews, fake downloads, fake views etc. etc. Again not saying they are profiting off of it as much as those are numbers you get promoted for moving up and to right in the OKR, not dow
72.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
I had no idea until I made an extension how messed up the ecosystem is. Now I regularly get offered ~5 figures a month in recurring revenue to turn my extension into malware & I've see how blatant the abuses are by other extensions
73.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
Is it that you don't believe these pieces of malware are generating fake engagement on Google's properties? Or that Clicks, Views & Users don't matter to Google?
74.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
It's part of the affiliate fraud...
75.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
Because the extensions generate fake engagement on Google's properties & ad-network for affiliate fraud.
76.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
Disagree, they are getting paid. Fake views, Fake clicks, Fake users on their platforms inflating the numbers. Making money off them didn't incentivize the grifts from coming about, but it slows down getting rid of it
77.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
They care about making money, but malicious extensions: damage the Google/Chrome brand, often are directly distorting the search experience and it opens them up to long tail liability (think Cambridge Analytica). The problem is the org
78.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
> I am absolutely flabbergasted at the fact that Chrome extension security is the way it is, considering how much Google spends to keep chrome secure. It's crazy and it's not even a "Google Scale" problem. There are o
79.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
> The right candidate with the right mindset is very hard to find. Yeah strongly agree but I also think you are looking in the wrong place. What I disagree with is the notion that the best co-founder is hard to find because they are doin
80.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
> EDIT: A key lesson learned for technical founders seeking co-founders where your target market is enterprise/B2B SaaS: the best non-technical candidates don't want to take the risk in a startup (because they are already makin
81.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
pretty much, I doubt they thought their own weapons would be turned against them
82.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
As a major media organization they definitely should have known better with the timing but I suppose they weren't expecting their employee's to turn it into a major story.
83.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
Don't worry about the paperwork.
84.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
So it wouldn't be confiscation or a punishment if the courts said you owed me a few years of your salary - because theoretically I could decide to give it back to you in the future? If you want to wire me a few years of your compensati
85.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
Confiscate: > Take or seize (someone's property) with authority. > To use one's authority to lay claim to and separate a possession from its holder. > to take (something) away from someone especially as punishment or to e
86.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
It's telling when people resort to ad hominem. The government is in the process of confiscating tens of billions of dollars from him - if thats not a real consequence I don't know what is. Wether or not that ruling only happened b
87.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
"Delaware Chancellory Court" of course being a political appointee in the home state of the powerful politician whom they had an adversarial relationship with, in this situation... but you know how these things work
88.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
They retroactively invalidated several years of compensation packages...
89.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
The current German state was made in the 90's. Personally don't think the German Democratic Republic had an excellent track with enfranchisement.
90.
▲
by
rKarpinski
2y ago
> The current German state has an excellent track record "Current state" is a convenient wording to exclude 1933-1990
More ›