r0muald

22 ms·

181.
The imaginary kingdom of Aurullia, made from fractals(creativeapplications.net)
2 points by r0muald 11y ago|0 comments
182.
Alpha Preview of EMacs Python (EMP)(kootenpv.github.io)
2 points by r0muald 11y ago|0 comments
183.
Try diffoscope online: one of the tools behind reproducible builds(try.diffoscope.org)
28 points by r0muald 11y ago|3 comments
184.
by r0muald 11y ago
I do hope this page is not the only source for the announcement, since it's a wiki page on a non-HTTPS MediaWiki instance that runs an abysmally old and unsupported (= unsafe) version of the software.
185.
by r0muald 11y ago
Furthermore pdiffs were introduced in ~2006: https://www.debian-administration.org/article/439/Avoiding_s...
186.
Claim that tardigrades got 1/6 of DNA from microbes is starting to unravel(theatlantic.com)
30 points by r0muald 11y ago|11 comments
187.
by r0muald 11y ago
Some of these ideas are implemented in fonts like Fira Code https://github.com/tonsky/FiraCode/ and Hasklig https://github.com/i-tu/Hasklig e.g. typing => gives ⇒ Both should be well known
188.
by r0muald 11y ago
This seems next-level trolling (it was closed and locked 3 hours ago). Perhaps GitHub needs more effective ways of punishing those users who actively waste other people's time?
189.
Fix the license of Apple Swift(github.com)
3 points by r0muald 11y ago|1 comments
190.
by r0muald 11y ago
Perhaps because the private beta was closed two days ago: https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/beta-program-announcemen...
191.
by r0muald 11y ago
You are right. An ASCII version is here http://pastebin.com/axGrNhAk
192.
by r0muald 11y ago
I suggest looking at the apps and tools developed by the Guardian Project https://guardianproject.info/code/ There was an encrypted note-taking app but it's not developed any more. The generic solution is to use G
193.
Why Use Make (2013)(bost.ocks.org)
4 points by r0muald 11y ago|1 comments
194.
by r0muald 11y ago
I didn't know the post was taken down. The text is likely corrupted because it was written in a PDF document and Academia.edu will mangle the PDF that is shown online (via scribd?). I don't know why it was taken down. I had downlo
195.
by r0muald 11y ago
An interesting related read is "On leaving Academia.edu" published by a professor who is going to leave the social networking site: https://imgur.com/NUBD8nn Edit: the original at https://www.academia.e
196.
by r0muald 11y ago
It's probably this http://o9i.de/2015/10/23/howto-gmscore.html
197.
DOI Citations in Wikipedia: A Crossref Labs Experiment with Raspberry Pi Zero(blog.crossref.org)
1 points by r0muald 11y ago|0 comments
198.
Tectonic: Cryptographic Chain of Trust from Application Layer to Hardware(tectonic.com)
1 points by r0muald 11y ago|0 comments
199.
A social networking site is not an open access repository(osc.universityofcalifornia.edu)
74 points by r0muald 11y ago|18 comments
200.
Telegram: When “Secure App” means share everyone's private metadata(twitter.com)
2 points by r0muald 11y ago|0 comments
201.
SSL from NameCheap: what is the difference? Encryption, Validation & Trust(blog.namecheap.com)
2 points by r0muald 11y ago|0 comments
202.
by r0muald 11y ago
This doesn't seem so uncommon for big projects at that department. I'm thinking for example about all the various tools developed by Noah Snavely and colleagues for the Photo Tourism project http://phototour.cs.washingt
203.
Wikipeaks: Saudi Cables, including cryptographic keys of embassies(wikileaks.org)
14 points by r0muald 11y ago|0 comments
204.
Metadata investigation: inside Hacking Team(labs.rs)
2 points by r0muald 11y ago|0 comments
205.
The Ultimate Vim Distribution(vim.spf13.com)
1 points by r0muald 11y ago|0 comments
206.
Rename smack-my-bitch-up(github.com)
1 points by r0muald 11y ago|1 comments
207.
Mira: create simple read-only APIs from CSV files(github.com)
44 points by r0muald 11y ago|7 comments
208.
by r0muald 11y ago
The "Antiquity à la carte" map has an ancient terrain layer by default : http://awmc.unc.edu/awmc/applications/alacarte/
209.
by r0muald 11y ago
I am generally skeptical of most "groundbreaking" research published in PNAS, since their peer review process is significantly flawed: http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/aug/16/flores-hobbi
210.
Capital in the 21st Century: Figures, Tables and Slides(github.com)
2 points by r0muald 11y ago|0 comments

More ›