r0h1n

49 ms·

421.
You're Drinking the Wrong Kind of Milk(motherjones.com)
1 points by r0h1n 13y ago|0 comments
422.
Google grants “super flagger” powers to British security officials for YouTube(vcpost.com)
1 points by r0h1n 13y ago|0 comments
423.
by r0h1n 13y ago
After a while all these news items about the NSA and GCHQ can seem a bit too much, but not if we take a step back and really understand the enormity of it all. The NSA and its cohorts set up fake Facebook websites, spoof security certific
424.
Transcript of Dianne Feinstein’s statement on CIA investigations(bostonglobe.com)
1 points by r0h1n 13y ago|0 comments
425.
The C.I.A. Torture Cover-Up(nytimes.com)
193 points by r0h1n 13y ago|57 comments
426.
This Is the Modern Axis of Buddhist Hate(blog.foreignpolicy.com)
1 points by r0h1n 13y ago|0 comments
427.
Women’s Unwillingness to Guess on Standardized Tests Hurts Their Scores(blogs.hbr.org)
2 points by r0h1n 13y ago|1 comments
428.
Where Have Japan’s Yakuza Gone?(thedailybeast.com)
1 points by r0h1n 13y ago|0 comments
429.
In China, brutality yields confessions of graft(bigstory.ap.org)
1 points by r0h1n 13y ago|0 comments
430.
After Big Bet, Hedge Fund Pulls the Levers of Power(mobile.nytimes.com)
6 points by r0h1n 13y ago|1 comments
431.
Your Ancestors, Your Fate(mobile.nytimes.com)
1 points by r0h1n 13y ago|0 comments
432.
by r0h1n 13y ago
Many of the comments on this thread are just lazy armchair theories, including this one. You talk about a "historical precedent" that goes back to when India firmly identified itself as a socialist country. And from that distant,
433.
by r0h1n 13y ago
I will grant you your first point if you can point me to a specific Indian law that says cartelization fines are a function of a multinational's global sales? As to your link on EU fines, it very clearly states that fines are a percent
434.
by r0h1n 13y ago
The article is bylined to the news agency Press Trust of India, so expect even less rigour and fact-checking than you would from the newspaper that's carrying the report (Times of India). While I can't comment on what the CCI will
435.
The Zero Dark Inc.(mag.newsweek.com)
1 points by r0h1n 13y ago|0 comments
436.
by r0h1n 13y ago
While I appreciate the intent behind this move, I'm curious who are the people who were paying $2400 (that's a serious amount of money) for what appears to be an introductory course that imparts no work skills (it's usually e
437.
Smart Labels(economist.com)
2 points by r0h1n 13y ago|0 comments
438.
Malaysia Airlines Says It Lost Contact With Plane Carrying Over 200(mobile.nytimes.com)
139 points by r0h1n 13y ago|96 comments
439.
Food-Delivery Fees Has South Koreans Debating The Marketplace Model(techcrunch.com)
1 points by r0h1n 13y ago|0 comments
440.
by r0h1n 13y ago
Thank you! This is my new colour tool instead of Piknik ( http://color.aurlien.net/ ) and Color Scheme Designer ( http://www.colorschemedesigner.com ).
441.
New Newsweek Taps Slovakian Paywall Gurus for an Ambitious Relaunch(mobile.businessweek.com)
1 points by r0h1n 13y ago|0 comments
442.
by r0h1n 13y ago
Thanks for that explanation.
443.
by r0h1n 13y ago
Here's a Getty Images executive expressing what you feel was my "personal assumption" > The new embeds are built on the same iframe code that lets you embed a tweet or a YouTube video, which means the company can use embed
444.
by r0h1n 13y ago
You've got what appears to be a nice, fair model. As a user though I see that CPM pricing isn't shown upfront, but must be requested via email. So, say I embed an image on my site and realize after 3-6 months that it's close
445.
by r0h1n 13y ago
Less sexy, more accurate title: "Getty to allow free embedding of low-res versions for some of its images. Embeds will contain advertising and other monetization options soon."
446.
by r0h1n 13y ago
The CIA director has pretty much acknowledged that they did indeed spy on the committee in this letter: http://www.wyden.senate.gov/news/press-releases/brennan-lett... > The Computer Crimes and Abuse Act...exp
447.
by r0h1n 13y ago
Thanks for that link. Very interesting.
448.
by r0h1n 13y ago
You do know Google has a history of having helped themselves to much more data than just public SSIDs, right? The reason I bring these up is to point out that Google's past behavior in this space hasn't exactly fostered trust. ht
449.
by r0h1n 13y ago
That's a great catch and something all of us (in our default anti-Google mode) missed. Feel silly now.
450.
by r0h1n 13y ago
Once upon a time the default privacy model used to be "opt-in". Which then became "opt-out" thanks in large parts to Google. Of course it helped that very few "lay people" take active steps to opt-out. It appea

More ›