qwantim1

10 ms·

61.
by qwantim1 6y ago
I’d assume they were already bugged. Also, whose to say all of the new equipment they replace it with won’t be bugged? And why do they even need offices in the capitol building at this point? Everything could be done online.
62.
by qwantim1 6y ago
No, I think you’re correct. Incomplete source is bad in any world. Unfortunately, it’s that world we live in for pretty much everything. Reproducibility? What if all of the source were to depend on part of a CPU instruction set that we stop
63.
by qwantim1 6y ago
Great advice! A correction: Ruby the language is not really a lock-in problem. It’s specifically DSLs, and the concept is non-Ruby specific. People that got bit by Chef (which is still great, but it can get unwieldy) may blame Ruby, but the
64.
by qwantim1 6y ago
It looks to be on-chip in M1: > The M1 uses 4266 MT/s LPDDR4X SDRAM[9] in a unified memory configuration shared by all the components of the processor.[1] [1]- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_M1
65.
by qwantim1 6y ago
Apple M1 seems to have ECC. > AppleFireStormErrorHandler AppleARM64ErrorHandler: will not panic on correctible ECC errors > Firestorm are the four high-performance CPU cores in the M1.[1] [1]- https://www.google.com/am
66.
by qwantim1 6y ago
There is no right kind of technical debt. By that I mean write code intentionally .
67.
by qwantim1 6y ago
It may be a great tip but Windows users shouldn’t have to do this. Microsoft needs to fix their shit.
68.
by qwantim1 6y ago
This is so awesome! I can’t wait to try it out! I saw it’s experimental currently, but are you planning on putting a lot of effort into it over the long haul? (I’m unsure whether I should look into it as a viable base for development.)
69.
by qwantim1 6y ago
Since “find a geeky massage therapist” is not helpful, my guess would be to convert BC -> USD -> RUB.
70.
by qwantim1 6y ago
Have terrestrial radio sources been ruled out?
71.
by qwantim1 6y ago
You believe the security of systemd is strong, and that CVEs are a sign of use and maturity, then you’re saying ~2 CVEs per year on average is compatible with good security. I understand you believe this, but I don’t see how it’s rational.
72.
by qwantim1 6y ago
How would you modify your argument rather than dismiss the evidence against it? For example, could you propose an equation using the number of CVEs and their severity along with the the rough number of known users, showing that some curve o
73.
by qwantim1 6y ago
> My personal moral code is that lying is bad; this is an article of faith for me, a central tenet of my religion. Do you believe truth can be known by humans, or that as a human you should try to be truthful, with truth as an ideal or a
74.
by qwantim1 6y ago
By that reasoning, Flash would be safe enough to stay around, seeing how many CVEs it had (1078 since the first CVE for it was published Dec 31, 2005). It’ll be gone tomorrow though, or January 12, or later in 2021.