quadcore

17 ms·

211.
by quadcore 4y ago
deleted
212.
by quadcore 4y ago
Good code.
213.
by quadcore 4y ago
I liked the fact it didnt count steps and has no score. More casual that way. Idea: rabbit grab an object (e.g. a key) and needs it to reach a cell.
214.
by quadcore 4y ago
deleted
215.
by quadcore 4y ago
Dont get me wrong I hate to terminate any life, but whats the issue regarding health I still dont get it.
216.
by quadcore 4y ago
Careful to all animals (Never washing spiders down the plughole) Whats that?
217.
by quadcore 4y ago
Your blender didnt learn survival from you. Yet.
218.
by quadcore 4y ago
your assertion that a random kid in 1950 had pretty good odds of a positive outcome compared to a modern kid having ‘very little’ chance of being happy. Didnt say a random kid. I said a kid randomly air dropped with no resource nor parent
219.
by quadcore 4y ago
Youre twisting my point. Im not saying society was better then. Im saying it was simpler in its structure and certainly more predictive for a given person. Maybe a little bit happier on average even but if we disagree on that no need to bre
220.
by quadcore 4y ago
The world is complex now, it was simple back then, let me explain. I was thinking the other day, in 1950, you could drop a kid randomly anywhere on the map (say the U.S. but not necessarily), he would easily find its way: to the farm, to th
221.
by quadcore 4y ago
You think you are not like them because of your choices when it's actually because of sheer luck. I respect them for carrying such a shitty poker hand their whole life. Anyway, you still gota defend yourself like they are monsters. Tel
222.
by quadcore 4y ago
Good question. As an educational note, please be careful and tell your kids some - unbalanced - people have no other endgame than to annoy you and play with your emotions. To destroy you mentally (sometimes physically as well). Thats their
223.
by quadcore 4y ago
I was thinking about a french int13 that was there in 2004. Im probably confusing. Good luck in your new venture anyway!
224.
by quadcore 4y ago
Wow are you still working on int13h? Amazing, you were there 20 years ago. The real value of graphic artists is not there I disagree. Take Samwise for example, this guy defined the style of half the video games the past 15 years. There is
225.
by quadcore 4y ago
Well funny because one of the consequences of the text2img and img2img revolution we've seen the past weeks will certainly be that real artists / illustrators will have to use NFTs. For the timestamps. To fight in court essenti
226.
by quadcore 4y ago
Added point 0.5 I forgot because of your comment.
227.
by quadcore 4y ago
Added point 5 I forgot, thanks to your comment.
228.
by quadcore 4y ago
I think people here are confusing everything. And Parent you dont realize that 10 years from now you might lose your job not because of some external factors but because you mindlessly got yourself out of your own job by using tools you don
229.
by quadcore 4y ago
Also, your opinion of your own ability to use sarcasm successfully is at the very least highly suspect. Please rephrase I dont get it. Do I not sound sincere? Rest assured I absolutely am.
230.
by quadcore 4y ago
Maybe we should go even further. There is no creativity in whatever that thing generate, it is always sophisticated plagiarism. Therefore training those models out of close regulated research environment and selling the output should be pro
231.
by quadcore 4y ago
Finaly a fair point. I dont know for sure and some here do, but my feeling is that we are still in a Moore's law in this art generation thing. If thats true, it means 10 years from now the AI will be able to mimic the very bests to per
232.
by quadcore 4y ago
Its also supervised in the sense that for-profit companies work on it to grab as much value as they can.
233.
by quadcore 4y ago
There isnt a result it wont be able to mimic in a short period of time.
234.
by quadcore 4y ago
but the good ones will still stand out. Yes, for a day or a week. The AI wont stop scanning and learning.
235.
by quadcore 4y ago
Fair point. I am not judging you Im just trying to educate an uneducated reader and call a cat a cat: there is no "AI artist" thats a lie. Only "AI trainers". And youre going after the entertainment industry, not art gal
236.
by quadcore 4y ago
Thanks for confirming I was relaying truthful informations about the market sizes. As an AI practitioner, if I could so easily bottle up taste and sell it, I surely would. And would you lie to protect it? Snuffaluffagus You're the
237.
by quadcore 4y ago
It’s just a blob of paint until someone says (with conviction) that it’s “art.” You perfectly know fine art isnt the issue here because its a small industry anyway and you guys arent investing dozens of billions to take over a niche indus
238.
by quadcore 4y ago
Parent is principal AI scientist (Id say a $1M+ per year position), his net worth (in billions) is very likely function of the success of these tech. It’s becoming pretty clear that some people are much better at harnessing these emerging
239.
by quadcore 4y ago
Id do the opposite, Id build the new json stuff on top of the firebase api.
240.
by quadcore 4y ago
All of the artists of the world will remove their online work. Who'd want to put their work online again? Its not even in the interests of the big players like Epic Games or Marvel or Disney. Nah I dont see how this is gonna fly. Im no

More ›