qsera

12 ms·

361.
by qsera 4mo ago
That is not really an evidence unless you yourself eliminate any biases or flaws in the trial methodology. Even trained professionals fail to do that regularly...
362.
by qsera 4mo ago
I am talking about a case when there IS some adverse effect, after it happened. In that case, there is generally an effort from the practitioners that the vaccine could not have caused it, particularly when the said thing is not mentioned
363.
by qsera 4mo ago
>Are you claiming that every developed country's medical bodies do not have an incentive to make the right decisions around vaccines? It is a question of how aligned the individual's incentives and the incentives of the medical
364.
by qsera 4mo ago
I am not even in US. And what I said is in a global context.
365.
by qsera 4mo ago
That "Vaccines are not profitable" is a misinformation put out there by...I don't know who, but it is out there somehow... It is really weird that even here in HN where everyone is aware of corporate greed and corruption, c
366.
by qsera 4mo ago
> All of the Covid deaths around me in the last couple years (7 deaths) Where exactly is this?
367.
by qsera 4mo ago
No, it is not about large trials. It is about changing the attitude of medical practitioners and the media that refuse to acknowledge a vaccine could have caused an adverse effect. I understand that this is to not feed the vaccine hesitancy
368.
by qsera 4mo ago
So what is the logic here? If the only entity that you can get information from is an entity that is known to lie, you can trust this entity? It is not that we know for a fact that X is not safe. It is that we have no reason to believe that
369.
by qsera 4mo ago
> it's a trade off but it's one that must be made. It is a trade off that is fair to the individual and to the society IF the society live up to its end of the bargain and had come up with a method of producing the vaccines wit
370.
by qsera 4mo ago
> people would rather let their children die. I see that your are yourself in a position you didn't reason you into.
371.
by qsera 4mo ago
>why can't they be positive? Because no one minds if good things happen...
372.
by qsera 4mo ago
Isn't that what they mean by "changing yourself"?
373.
by qsera 4mo ago
So it depends on how you want to measure it.
374.
by qsera 4mo ago
And the worse thing is that their feed back probably goes into the training of the next LLM. So more free labor for the AI companies.
375.
by qsera 4mo ago
But it is hard to verify it, right? If you use rsync clone by an LLM to copy a million files, will you bother to verify every single one was copied correctly?
376.
by qsera 4mo ago
How is that creationism? Saying that we don't have a good answer is not the same as suggestion one particular hypothesis. To me suggesting that sounds pretty anti-intellectual!
377.
by qsera 4mo ago
> We have not ended up with "humans which aren't as strong, aren't as smart, aren't as well adapted to a changing environment, etc." Haven't we?
378.
by qsera 4mo ago
> humans which aren't as strong, aren't as smart, aren't as well adapted to a changing environment, etc. But can they pay and vote? If yes, that is good enough for the people calling the shots.
379.
by qsera 4mo ago
>It's kind of like life insurance; term makes sense but whole life doesn't (vs investing the premiums). But in term, you lose everything that you ever pay. Even If you consider the loss of interest in whole life, would the diff
380.
by qsera 4mo ago
Everyone is one death away from losing everything anyway...
381.
by qsera 4mo ago
Who said it forgets it?
382.
by qsera 4mo ago
Approximately how old are you? 20s? 30s? 40s? 50s?...
383.
by qsera 4mo ago
You are forgetting the fact that many allopathic medicines are also junk cures which are seldom not better than a placebo (pushed through by flawed methodologies and corruption). And when they are found, they gets banned in US, but continue
384.
by qsera 4mo ago
>Has RFK been petitioned? It is really funny when people claim that Trump just want his friends to make money. Will someone explain to me how all Trumps friends are making money from pseudo science and not from the biggest and ever growi
385.
by qsera 4mo ago
Try drinking a pint dry, and try drinking it diluted with water. And let me know what was easy...
386.
by qsera 4mo ago
>There's enough money in 'crank health' that, But there is many order of magnitude more money invested in preventing the publication of something like that.. All the "reputed" journals who gets funded by pharma w
387.
by qsera 4mo ago
Here is something real for you. Here is an insightful comment [1] in this thread but it is "dead" now, thanks to the down votes of true believers of "science". Any study that goes against the narrative despite any of the
388.
by qsera 4mo ago
I think the point is clear. If it is not clear to you, you are already beyond help...
389.
by qsera 4mo ago
What do you mean "of course we do"? Take education for example. Even in the 70s it was recognized as nothing better than something that create pencil pushers for the government and businesses..If we have more funds, we would just
390.
by qsera 4mo ago
Mmmm..the question is..who would fund it. And if someone funded it, who would publish it...

More ›