Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
qqii
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
38 ms
·
361.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
In reality noise cancelling headphones don't "just reverse the wave", since that's often not fast or accurate enough (too noisy). Instead it's more like: mic -> fft -> secret suace analysis and filtering ->
362.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
Since some projects use their github README as a landing page and the rise of termux, yeah I think it is important.
363.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
Example repository of a project that's invested in using GitHub: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Discussion on /r/github: https://www.reddit.com/r/github/comments/hei81f&#
364.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
It would depend on what services you'd like to run though. A decent chunk of apps may need proot to run in pure termux and others for you to root your device. Mobile (proper) Linux support for devices is still not thst great even if ar
365.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
I guess it depends on what you mean by shoot themselves in the foot. There are major differences in philosophy and bar the "superficial" differences these are quite different projects. For one nix simply doesn't have a projec
366.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
In GNU fashion they're using savannah mailing lists and email patches so to those who are comfortable with git{hub,lab} it's slightly less familiar. Here is their git repository: https://savannah.gnu.org/projects&#
367.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
This post is a pretty good example, for I don't know of any nix projects that are attempting to work on the bootstrapping problem. Guix pack[0] solves a parallel issue of distributing your nicely dependancy managed ecosystem whereas ni
368.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
I'm really glad that guix has been working on this area. Apart from using scheme this is one of the core areas that really distinguish them from nix. Just compare the difficulty of trying to use the third party nix-bundle to produce a
369.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
Firstly there's a difference between impartial third parties and third parties which a record of being impartial. Secondly I wouldn't endorse using OpenBazaar in its current state. The ideas and concepts are there but the user ex
370.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
This is not always strictly true, with projects like OpenBazaar the risks can be transfered to an explicit third party with a proven record of being impartial.
371.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
Ooh, I've not seen wiktor-k/openpgp-proofs before. Too bad it doesn't have more adoption, as I like it's solution to keybase's centralization. Sadly neither project has an elegant solution to private accounts or ser
372.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
I haven't followed them too closely for a while but wasn't the cryptocurrency misstep an answer to critics about the safety of keybase as keeper of the database[0]? Now that I'm looking it although their docs don't menti
373.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
I've not made myself very clear in the comment, but git and fossil scm are simply examples that delegate issues of trust to PGP's web of trust. Hardware keys are more secure, but from my understanding still stuffer from the same i
374.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
I've seen similar projects that use S/MIME for identity management, but as seen from the README of the tool[0] the benefits of PGP's web of trust can be seen in unstructured environments. Online identities are perhaps the mos
375.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
I now see how my original wording is confusing. I'm using git not as the specific case here (albeit interesting) but as an example. From my understanding keybase attempts to solve some of the more questions in your first link, simply &
376.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
That sounds really interesting, would you be willing to share a link to the message board so I can see what your account creation process looks like? The other most common place I've seen PGP used as an account identifier are in darkne
377.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
I'm not endorsing keybase, in fact I have much of the same criticisms as you probably do. The fact is unlike many PGP replacements most don't attempt to solve similar ideas as the "web of trust". For those that I know do
378.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
https://wellcomecollection.org/works/s8yb9bt9
379.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
Although I agree with your point, both the article and your comment suffer from different use cases + threat models. I'd agree that there are no real alternatives to (regular) mail and email where longer form asynchronous communication
380.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
The writer of the article wrote another one that is linked where he criticises other uses of PGP[0]. [0]: https://latacora.micro.blog/2019/07/16/the-pgp-problem.html
381.
▲
by
qqii
6y ago
Having an alternative implementation to GnuPG is a pretty important. Although many would argue against the use of PGP encryption for many use cases such as email, there are other use cases where PGP's ideas have no replacement. For a s
382.
▲
by
qqii
7y ago
It powers the Guix OS, and since its all Guile if you're a fan of lisp it's pretty good.
383.
▲
by
qqii
7y ago
That's really interesting, thanks for sharing.
384.
▲
by
qqii
7y ago
Interesting project, it'll definitely be something I consider! I've been hacking together things with gron[0] and coreutils when I do want tabular data. jello looks pretty interesting too, but I'm not sure if I agree with pyt
385.
▲
by
qqii
7y ago
Have you seen jc[0]? Now for the json bash interface the only thing that's missing a nicer json renderer (perhaps table format) to have a similar feature parity to Nushell. [0]: https://github.com/kellyjonbrazil/jc
386.
▲
by
qqii
7y ago
I used powershell a bit when I was mainly using Windows and tried it briefly when moving back to Linux. The biggest issue is when you're stepping outside of powershell commands which return nice objects and run linux scripts or executa
387.
▲
by
qqii
7y ago
I'm curious if you've ever played with powershell or jq/jc/jsonifying *sh and how this compares? I had a period when I was mainly on windows where I quite enjoyed powershell and now that I'm back on linux I moved to
388.
▲
by
qqii
7y ago
Nushell sounds like New Shell to me, which is a pretty apt name.
389.
▲
by
qqii
7y ago
I don't know what audiophile circles you're in but when I started getting into headphones phone DACs were looked at with scrutiny. For most earbuds it's "good enough" whereas for higher end headphones it is both acc
390.
▲
by
qqii
7y ago
Unfortunately I think plan9 only remains this way by keeping the people who use it small, being elitist and somewhat unwelcoming[0]. That's not to say I wouldn't also recommend spending a weekend messing around. I was recently hav
More ›