qcnguy

26 ms·

211.
by qcnguy 1y ago
> So is not being berated for their height, lack of big muscles or whatever it is one "lacks" compared to the model man. Sounds like you haven't been in the dating pool for a few decades. Go on Tinder and look at what wo
212.
by qcnguy 1y ago
Left wing philosophy did not start and end with Marx. Leftists who pretend 1900s era leftism is somehow the True Left are annoying. He was just one in a series of extremely far left thinkers. Most people with a good historical education wou
213.
by qcnguy 1y ago
Usually in polling they aim for about 2000 people to represent a country.
214.
by qcnguy 1y ago
Java runtimes is just: export JAVA_HOME=/path; ./app.sh
215.
by qcnguy 1y ago
That governments struggle with rounding and maths isn't a justification for arguing 1% of GDP doesn't matter. It's a vast sum of money. In the UK's case getting an extra 1% of GDP for free was a no brainer. Its economy h
216.
by qcnguy 1y ago
They didn't walk away from it. Someone blew up the pipelines.
217.
by qcnguy 1y ago
1% of GDP of an entire country is massive, that's not a rounding error!
218.
by qcnguy 1y ago
Yeah, but the question is whether your demand for Claude Code would be as high as it is, if Anthropic were charging enough to cover their costs. Not this fake "the model is profitable if you ignore training the next model" stuff b
219.
by qcnguy 1y ago
But the post you're replying to is about a legal substance, so that doesn't seem relevant.
220.
by qcnguy 1y ago
And Hillary Clinton. Thinking you can change strongly held opinions with advertising is wrong.
221.
by qcnguy 1y ago
> they find the idea of developing that competency unattractive You are repeating exactly what I'm saying you're saying. They could develop that competency. They don't want to because the juice isn't worth the squee
222.
by qcnguy 1y ago
By "not good enough" you mean "not motivated enough" which boils down to what the OP said. It's not a big problem in reality for most people.
223.
by qcnguy 1y ago
Anthropic have done some great work on neural interpretability that gets at the core of this problem.
224.
by qcnguy 1y ago
Wikipedia's bias is the result of a deliberate long term campaign to make it biased. It's not "mistakes".
225.
by qcnguy 1y ago
Congrats on being an excellent example of why leftists should never be allowed anywhere near anything important, especially not Wikipedia. You could have cited ANY story from the long history of the Daily Mail to demonstrate some kind of in
226.
by qcnguy 1y ago
They don't inspect every return - that would make the already ropey economics of allowing returns very unviable - and it's often hard to detect return fraud because the fraudsters are returning an object that's nearly the sam
227.
by qcnguy 1y ago
You don't know they sold their account to a fraudster. You only know that the delivery address changed. That's a very weak signal.
228.
by qcnguy 1y ago
Still not a scam. Stop damaging the language.
229.
by qcnguy 1y ago
Yes but so what? All that proves is the account is aged. It doesn't prove it's not been taken over or sold. People move pretty regularly or order things for friends/family, a change of address doesn't mean anything.
230.
by qcnguy 1y ago
Amazon is in a hard spot with this stuff. They have massive problems with refund fraud, where people buy things and returning fake or used items in the box. Asking for ID is one way they try to spot people who are engaged in this activity r
231.
by qcnguy 1y ago
Switching costs only make sense to talk about for fully online businesses. The "switching cost" for McDonalds depends heavily on whether there's a Burger King nearby. If there isn't then your "switching cost" m
232.
by qcnguy 1y ago
That report is just looking at the top 10% of cited published papers. China publishes huge numbers of garbage papers from paper mills and runs lots of citation rings. It also assumes that "tech leadership" comes from academia inst
233.
by qcnguy 1y ago
There is huge bias to the left. Wikipedia outright bans right wing sources from being used as citations, including non-US sources like the Daily Mail, so it's not true that it's something to do with US bias. This isn't due to
234.
by qcnguy 1y ago
How is that not understanding a hypothetical? Seems they understand it just fine, what they're saying is they don't have the needed knowledge/confidence to answer the question. Not understanding a hypothetical would go like t
235.
by qcnguy 1y ago
> I had a Claude Sonnet 4 agent try your prompt. It produced a 90 line python file in 7 minutes that reads the entire file into memory, performs floating point multiplication, doesn't correctly display the money values, and would c
236.
by qcnguy 1y ago
Does that extend to the staff or do you just have some weird hangup about collective groups? Because you know NGOs often pay their CEOs huge salaries, well beyond what they need to survive. It's all profit.
237.
by qcnguy 1y ago
But why would I want to reliably produce similar code? The underspec is deliberate. Maybe I don't care about the name of the column as long as it's reasonable. How to represent prices: same. This is computer nonsense. There's
238.
by qcnguy 1y ago
Not really, code even in high level languages is always lower level than English just for computer nonsense reasons. Example: "read a CSV file and add a column containing the multiple of the price and quantity columns". That'
239.
by qcnguy 1y ago
The Guardian article says what I'm saying and quotes the authorities saying that too. Why are you citing that as an argument? > Prosecutors allege that, after Robinson’s arrest in Kirk’s killing, his mother told investigators that
240.
by qcnguy 1y ago
You're admitting you're wrong? You're now agreeing that the US army could suppress an insurrection indefinitely and could only be stopped by a split within the military itself. A scenario that has nothing in common with what

More ›