qayxc

83 ms·

871.
by qayxc 5y ago
I think this more an example how black-box models are basically useless for clinical research. The authors aren't aware of any distinguishing retinal features between male and female eyes and the model itself has no explanatory power.
872.
by qayxc 5y ago
That would make sense only if Li-Ion batteries didn't have power densities north of 250 W⋅h/kg. Commercial battery cells used in vehicle sized applications, however, often do exceed this value. So even at a 20% loss due to tempera
873.
by qayxc 5y ago
I'm not referring to using Amp-hours - note that I quoted capacities of competing products using the same unit. What grinds my gears is copy-pasting without understanding the notation. mAh g-1 is not a unit. mA⋅h⋅g<sup>-1<&#x2
874.
by qayxc 5y ago
> It is common notation to put a -1 exponent to indicate division. I have zero issues with using negative exponents, what I do take issue with is writing "g-1" in an online publication. You either use proper HTML to write an
875.
by qayxc 5y ago
> You are doing the tutorial, just lovely, now in a week you want to make a Discord bot! Great first project. Uh oh, RED Discord Bot requires Python 3.8 Ok, now you've lost me completely. I am at a total loss as to what you're
876.
by qayxc 5y ago
Nah, that just doesn't make any sense at all. It even contradicts their own numbers, which calculated the charge time for an average phone to 1 - 5 minutes [0]. IMO this article is just a hot mess cobbled together by someone who doesn&
877.
by qayxc 5y ago
While the research itself sound promising, the article leaves a lot to be desired. The use of units and their notation is horrendous, almost as if the author doesn't know even the first thing about SI units and their use: > 197 mAh
878.
by qayxc 5y ago
Agreed. Para-terraforming is a criminally underrated concept. With "terraforming" you'd have the problem that dozens of generations would have to work their proverbial asses off without ever experiencing the fruits of their l
879.
by qayxc 5y ago
> You're excused. It's clear that assessing public company valuations is not your area. Basic business economics doesn't seem to be your area. Here's a basic example of how you can shoot the "public valuation&quo
880.
by qayxc 5y ago
> If student A spends 1 hour installing Python (with questionable success rate) & setting up an environment (with even more questionable success rate), [...] I hear this a lot, and maybe I'm just too far removed from a total beg
881.
by qayxc 5y ago
> The weight is so critical that the 7-seat plane can realistically only seat 4-5 adults. I think you overlooked an important factor there. The plane was indeed designed to realistically seat 7 adults. The issue is that in the 50 years
882.
by qayxc 5y ago
> [...] he updated his knowledge in the last few months and/or had his opinion on Bitcoin changed by communication from others in the organisation. The former idea is ridiculous - so the "Techno King of Tesla" (his choice
883.
by qayxc 5y ago
> Designing the full stack to be minimally intrusive seems unique. Using the words "minimally intrusive" in the context of open brain surgery is quite amusing to me. No matter who or what performs the surgical intervention, it
884.
by qayxc 5y ago
It's a figure of speech and meant to be completely neutral and independent of the actual person. Just like "the face of the company", e.g. Pat Gelsinger in the case of Intel or Tim Cook for Apple.
885.
by qayxc 5y ago
Or - and this might sound a little tin foil-hat - this was a strategic move to send the price of Bitcoin down, so they can buy the 10% they sold in Q1 back at lower price. Crypto is an unregulated market with ridiculously high volatility an
886.
by qayxc 5y ago
It was a classic pump-and-dump if you ask me. Step 1: purchase $1.5Bn in Bitcoin Step 2: make an announcement that will likely result in a rising valuation (it briefly went up by ~20% just because Musk added #bitcoin to his bio on Twitter..
887.
by qayxc 5y ago
Not only that - it's kind of a flawed comparison anyway. None of the F9 boosters are orbital vehicles, i.e. they cannot even be compared to the Space Shuttle since their only commonality is that both are rocket-powered vehicles that cr
888.
by qayxc 5y ago
> Everyone knows that only newbies do coding errors in C, so why spend the extra money? /s The Ariane 5 maiden flight disaster illustrated quite clearly that the choice of language has little influence on the actual correctness of a
889.
by qayxc 5y ago
They mentioned they also had a custom Windows desktop as well. I guess one problem is that cross-system data synchronisation is still a non-trivial task.
890.
by qayxc 5y ago
> The CPU / System is simply not designed for these type of usage. Especially with zero cooling. While I agree that consumer hardware in general and laptops in particular aren't designed for this usage, internal overheating sho
891.
by qayxc 5y ago
clang does the same - I tested it back to clang 7.0. So clang did this for a long time it seems.
892.
by qayxc 5y ago
Highly unlikely. It's pretty much impossible to detect the difference between a friendly banter, a heated debate, trolling, and genuine harassment for most people given just a chat log. There's often much more information required
893.
by qayxc 5y ago
> restoring whales population to their pre-industrial levels could have the same effect as planting several billion trees. I would like to see the maths on that :D Whales usually don't create their own microclimate or provide a habi
894.
by qayxc 6y ago
> You judge from subjective view. Should we all? I do not like macOS and Windows experience. It is full of distractions. You judge from a subjective view. There's no discoverability in the screenshot you shared. It's all subjec
895.
by qayxc 6y ago
So you don't do anything below XK-class end-of-the-world scenarios, so you? Your massive overreaction shows no difference to your perceived enemies. This is a game and the creators want to limit the game world and the actions therein t
896.
by qayxc 6y ago
Good question. I honestly don't know. We would have to re-evaluate the value of IP as whole first, I guess.
897.
by qayxc 6y ago
> Let's say it takes 5 minutes to properly adjudicate a dispute. That's highly unrealistic, but review alone would take at least twice as long, since the average video length is about 12 minutes. How would you find out in just
898.
by qayxc 6y ago
> There should be some sort of modest cost somewhere to stop this nonsense. Playing the Devil's Advocate here: But wouldn't that in turn incentivise actual copyright infringement on account of it potentially being cheaper to ma
899.
by qayxc 6y ago
It's a problem of scale. It's perfectly possibile to manage a few hundred disputes on a daily basis, but with >5000 uploads per minute, it becomes impossible to do manually. The worst part is the asymmetry between claimants and
900.
by qayxc 6y ago
And what exactly would that solve? Now you've shifted the problem to a different organisation without addressing the actual issue: bad actors and copyright trolls being asymmetrically favoured over content creators. Being a non-profit

More ›