q-rews

13 ms·

1. 121.▲
   by q-rews 5y ago

   That risk is fine to me. I meant it more as a “people eat it, so it must be likable” than “people eat it, so it won’t kill me.”
2. 122.▲
   by q-rews 5y ago

   My logic is: If others eat it, it’s fine. It also helps to eat it with someone who’s somewhat familiar with it. My first time in Thailand I ate a disgusting salty soup with a spoon. It turns out you’re supposed to dip vegetables in it. What
3. 123.▲
   by q-rews 5y ago

   You can try to flip genders and try to make it sound sexist, but obviously that doesn't work here, as the post suggests. A successful 50yo man can easily find a partner; A successful 50yo woman cannot (as easily).
4. 124.▲
   by q-rews 5y ago

   Indeed it feels like this could be somewhat resolved by: - having npm contact the user - placing the package in a no-owner (and deprecated) state for a while From the instructions it seems that you can just contact npm and say
5. 125.▲
   by q-rews 5y ago

   Now I'm curious to know what technical opinions one could have after giving up a name. Mentioning the change in the readme? Releasing a new major version?