Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pxmpxm
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
35 ms
·
451.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
I have not heard of this before - thanks for the evening reading.
452.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
Fun point I read about this topic while back is that planes essentially cost the same amount of money per pound in the air, so building anything with two times the MTOW is an inherent disadvantage.
453.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
My first thought as well - the author must be doing this stuff as a hobby/for fun, because that's not nearly enough to comp you for the time spent.
454.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
New subdivision next door, so I bought two houses to live in.
455.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
> systemically pushed to provide the least amount of maintenance, repair, and amenities for the most amount of money That argument can literally be applied to any product or service, yet here we are. There is a peculiar correlation I hav
456.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
That's a bit of an inane, edgelord take, no?
457.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
Ah definitely misread it, thought I vaguely remember Forbes and/or NYT being the cheerleaders at the time.
458.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
I mean it's the New York Times, a story about female STEM start up founder is essentially an identity politics version of crack to them.
459.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
Well queues for proletariat and magic vouchers for the actual commies that would allow them skip that nonsense.
460.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
Received mine last week, fantastic book!
461.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
Oh crazy, never realize that either. That SL does look better with round ones though...
462.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
Cost of resistive heating is around 2-5x the amount you'd pay for nat gas equivalent. Probably not that dumb, unless your actually point is that poor people just need to be cold for climate change.
463.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
Non-sequitur, but I love that I get this sort of first-hand color on a niche industry on HN.
464.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
The Chicago one had about an hour wait to get seated for saturday brunch; clearly those burgers should be selling for way more than $30.
465.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
Those programs are universally designed to buy votes, rather than firearms. They are wasting public funds to further their narrative that gun violence is an entirely natural phenomenon - sort of like a hurricane - where people people involv
466.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
The question was intentionally crafted for that effect :)
467.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
>once you know that you are not Making my point for me - the usage is "undo a commit" or "undo a file accidentally added to a commit", what you mentioned are implementation details that are leaking up to the interfa
468.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
Uh huh, now imagine you've built something with usage in mind, rather than a hodgepodge of leaky abstractions for what's happening behind the scenes: git undo git undo file
469.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
> Clunky, it is not. I want to roll back an accidental commit of an extra file to the previous, uncommitted state. Or even simpler, undo a commit to restore the exact state just before it happened.
470.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
That's not necessarily true, right? There are large costs associated with changing what we're doing and in absence of being able to actually control the climate, those resources would be better spent on dealing with the outcome. I
471.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
"Fortunately, the attacker here only forged two messages, but the damage could have been far worse" Only 600bucks, phew. Mass adoption around the corner.
472.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
There was a fun stat that model S cars when then first came out had bay far the largest proportion of first-time-in-this-price range buyers. I can't fathom that someone coming from his/her 10th s class would characterize Teslas as
473.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
What you wrote is entirely incorrect. You cannot wash trade algorithmically any more than you could do by hand (as a matter of fact, virtually all exchanges have self trade prevention that will cancel your netting orders), and exchanges pub
474.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
This seems like a far better idea than the segregated bike lanes with stuff in the middle (parking etc), because you can actually see any potential intersection contentions from afar. I'm still unclear how the former is ever a good ide
475.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
The proportions on that plane are all sorts of funny: https://aeroin.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/sofia_take_off...
476.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
So your grand idea is to replace commercial delivery traffic in new york city with bicycles?
477.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
Well of course it is, either a delivery truck unloads it to your local bodega, or an an amazon car unloads it to your doorstep. Again during the workweek, vast majority of street parking is only open to those two options, yet double parking
478.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
Vast majority of space, especially around the Manhattan and the dense part of Brooklyn and Bronx already is commercial unloading only Mon-Fri, yet the dynamic I mentioned is common place. Again high density implies shortage of space - you
479.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
Highly dense neighborhoods will invariably have cars, and especially delivery vehicles, double parking all over because density always implies shortage of space; bike lanes are in now way special in this context, unless you're suburban
480.
▲
by
pxmpxm
4y ago
Reminiscent of the "simplify and then add lightness" quote from Colin Chapman (of Lotus cars fame)
More ›