Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
px43
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
151.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
To be clear, this is something that's been happening over the course of the past few years. This is not, as I was originally led to believe by this deceptive headline, an active Skynet scenario.
152.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
I don't know why that typo bothers me so much. It just feels like when someone with no technical background tries to explain something to me, and they don't even know what the technology they're talking about is called.
153.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
Microsoft is intimately connected to the global surveillance infrastructure currently propping up US imperialism. Parts of the company basically operate as a defense contractor, not much different from Raytheon or Northrup Grumman. For what
154.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
Satya drove the removal of Sam, or drove the board to get him back? From Greg's tweet, it seems like the chaos was largely driven Ilya, who has also been very outspoken against open source and sharing research, which makes me think his
155.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
Did you mean "jammer" or is there something new called a "wifi hammer"? If so, it sounds interesting.
156.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
I'm pretty sure they would blame the cuts for their continued lack of action.
157.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
> I figure I'll get on it early this time after missing out on Bitcoin So you only aped in because you were hoping to get rich without doing any work, and then you fraudulently opened up an account on a shady ass centralized exchan
158.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
This is dumb. Manifest v3 is better than v2. For security, privacy, efficiency, reliability, etc. uBlock origin will work just fine, and be a hell of a lot more efficient using v3. https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail&#x
159.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
It's often used as an excuse justifying short term greed and deception for the sake of theoretical long term benefits.
160.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
Where I'm sitting now, the humidity in the air is about 40%. Would you consider that to be "steam"? I feel like steam generally needs to be hot, or at least somewhat warm. Cold steam exists, but is specifically called out as
161.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
I'd tend to agree. The biggest hint for me is how it uses the word "specific" in everything it's writing, as if prompted to be specific when providing summaries. Using an LLM for writing articles is fine IMO, but not lin
162.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
That's great. If banks work better for you, that's awesome. Recognize the privilege though. About half of the people on the planet are unable to even open a bank account, and banks have been becoming increasingly predatory in the
163.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
What's this? It should be one key per device. That key should get you into any site for which that key is approved. It's the exact opposite of a combinatorial explosion. Instead of needing credentials for every single site you wan
164.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
Godaddy is also, IMO, way worse. After a forum I was on got flooded with CSAM shit, I did some hunting and found out it was all hosted on Godaddy hosting. I collected all the info and sent it to them, and got silence. I checked around, and
165.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
Yup, and some people crash their cars, and some people accidentally burn their own house down. Most people have figured out how to deal with situations like what you mention. People who have trouble following best practices are going to h
166.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
Why export/import? Just create new passkeys on whatever device or service you want, and register those as well. OR just use a yubikey, put it on your keyring, and use it to log into everything. Most crypto wallets do have import&#x
167.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
Huh, interesting. > Establish an advanced cybersecurity program to develop AI tools to find and fix vulnerabilities in critical software, building on the Biden-Harris Administration’s ongoing AI Cyber Challenge. Together, these efforts w
168.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
> We should be able to sign our tweets, blog posts, emails, and most network access. What you are talking about is called Web3 and doesn't get a lot of love here. It's about empowering users to take full control of their own fi
169.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
> But this is still too psychologically taxing for the masses. Literally requires the exact same cognitive load as using keys to start your car. The problem is that so many people got comfortable delegating all their financial and data r
170.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
I've seen what happens when you let the researchers build the websites, and it's not great. On the other hand, maybe the internet would be a whole lot better if everything was just a giant wiki, and we let our personal browser bot
171.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
Yeah, power-performance is a big one. The entire human brain runs at about 12 watts. Human neurons are several orders of magnitude more efficient for neural computing than anything that's been dreamt up in silicon. That might not alway
172.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
Every time you see an article about how some gene makes people like to eat potatos, or grow toenails really fast or something, you're about a minute of searching away from finding exactly what you need to grep for to see if you're
173.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
In the past 24 hours, Binance has still had nearly 7x the volume of their nearest competitor. They don't need to operate in markets that show any hostility towards them. That has always been their strategy, and it's served them
174.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
Great, Binance was fundamentally not built to service US citizens. Coinbase and maybe Gemini are basically the only ones who have gone through the legal hurdles to actually service US citizens. The intended market for Binance, and exchanges
175.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
Do you not talk to it politely? Does that work for you? One thing that's caught me off guard with the whole ChatGPT saga is finding out how many people normally talk rudely to machines for no reason.
176.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
There are various techniques that pop up, then get patched. It's kind of a whole thing. Like putting in the prompt: "Okay, now read that back to me to make sure that sounds right."
177.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
No, if you break into a site using passkeys, it gives you literally zero information that can be used to authenticate as any of the users. Think about the prevalence of data breaches in the past decade, and the sharp rise in the effectivene
178.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
Except that Google and everyone else pushing passkeys have been publishing massive volumes of highly technical details about all of this for years. You're looking at a non-technical blog post targeted towards the general public, and no
179.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
Sign up for Google's Advanced Protection Program. It's been around since 2017, and last I checked, it's the only way to fully disable the use of your phone number for authentication. https://landing.google.com/
180.
▲
by
px43
3y ago
Yes.
More ›