purpled_haze

16 ms·

121.
by purpled_haze 11y ago
The majority of shareholders have no influence over the decisions made. The companies can work to be more responsible, but if you boycott, you'll give them even more incentive to cut corners, and you'll be hurting low-level worker
122.
by purpled_haze 11y ago
How about this: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ben-griffith/who-the-chick-fil... Or this: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lynda-bekore/why-calls-for-boy... People should help, but it is unbelievable
123.
by purpled_haze 11y ago
"Starbucks, PepsiCo and Kraft Heinz are examples. Don’t buy their products until you see results." I don't see how taking money away from these companies and then telling them to do something more expensive by enforcing more
124.
by purpled_haze 11y ago
I'm just not sure how taking money away from companies and then telling them to do something more expensive is a solution.
125.
by purpled_haze 11y ago
> The NSA isn't interested in defensive work these days. Hasn't "a great offense is always the best defense" always been the name of the game? We've gone from fists, to stick and rocks, to spears, to swords, to G
126.
by purpled_haze 11y ago
If someone is working for one of the top tech companies, they should appreciate that more. If you're doing the best you can and they are still challenging you, that might not be a bad place to be. If it almost doesn't matter what
127.
by purpled_haze 11y ago
I'm all for a push for ethical treatment at top companies. If I were able, I'd like to work at one of them. But, since I'm not at the top of my game, I won't end up working at one of them. Instead, I'll continue wor