ptah

40 ms·

391.
by ptah 7y ago
there should be a some kind of spirit of the law wording in addition i think.
392.
by ptah 7y ago
no, you are applying the thing "metaphorised" inside the metaphor. it is quite wrongheaded tbh
393.
by ptah 7y ago
most studies show that diversity leads to increased productivity and innovation. it actually reduces the cost of doing business significantly. this is the only reason big corporates are doing it as they are purely driven by their bottom lin
394.
by ptah 7y ago
i think you are trying to stretch the metaphor too far
395.
by ptah 7y ago
this is not a new problem. it's been around since at least the industrial revolution
396.
by ptah 7y ago
sounds like it is a congress thing
397.
by ptah 7y ago
it should be harder for predators
398.
by ptah 7y ago
>600,000 people stranded abroad >For the 150,000 stranded customers who are British, the U.K. government has just announced so the majority who are not british are just stranded?
399.
by ptah 7y ago
carbon taxes are ineffective, a workaround for something missing at the core of economics
400.
by ptah 7y ago
you were lucky to not get scammed or groomed sexually
401.
by ptah 7y ago
anything that makes it easier for corporations to program humans like rats in a labyrinth is inherently a bad idea
402.
by ptah 7y ago
> you get to talk to people from all around the world i would say this is a bug not a feature. it should take time and effort to talk to people all over the world.
403.
by ptah 7y ago
> hidden from everyone else who will only be able to see who but now how many people gave a thumbs-up or other reaction. if you can see a list of who has reacted, you can still tally it up to see what the number of reactions are
404.
by ptah 7y ago
>Activism is threatening value destruction for all, not only the environment. how can you draw a distinction. destroying your environment is destroying yourself. does existing not have value?
405.
by ptah 7y ago
amazon also does this and i'm sure other corporates too. that is a much bigger problem imo
406.
by ptah 7y ago
i'm not a woman, but i've seen women getting spammed with dick pics leading many to stay away completely from these sites
407.
by ptah 7y ago
they are using amazon's own tactics: https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/8/8/20726863/amazon-pays-war...
408.
by ptah 7y ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvje_5IVjmo
409.
by ptah 7y ago
the intro course definitely addressed different climates and this one does too. the lead instructor practices permaculture in Arizona and he is all about using shade properly and water harvesting. he specialises in desert agriculture: http
410.
by ptah 7y ago
you can sign up for this. it starts 30 sept. if you do: i'll see you in class discussions :) https://pace.oregonstate.edu/catalog/permaculture-design-cer...
411.
by ptah 7y ago
not possible either with cuts made by tory government
412.
by ptah 7y ago
I would say: - go vegan - learn permaculture/similar to grow some of your own food - invest in tree planting/greening initiatives
413.
by ptah 7y ago
> high consumption of America’s “poor” this is actually a huge negative and flips the result on it's head if you look at it from a climate change perspective. EDIT: if they have to consume so much more, surely they are not having it
414.
by ptah 7y ago
I like the question based structure of this article. it does lack the one question I have though: "How does it affect everyone else that is not a bank?"
415.
by ptah 7y ago
yip, can't buy new weapons if you don't use the ones you already have
416.
by ptah 7y ago
>hey use this stuff as proof that the USA is anti-muslim or to prove that there is a war against muslims going on. isn't there though? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-49764305
417.
by ptah 7y ago
> the article does mention neonicotinoids as a direct reason for the decline in population current administration is firmly behind even further decline: https://newfoodeconomy.org/neonicotinoid-ban-reversal-center...
418.
by ptah 7y ago
globalization only started in the 80's
419.
by ptah 7y ago
the article seem to state that they are making things inefficient through lobbying to get a bigger piece of the pie i.e. greater cost
420.
by ptah 7y ago
Does it make sense then to limit the impact by de-globalising economic activity to a scale that can be more easily understood?

More ›