pseudosavant

60 ms·

841.
by pseudosavant 12y ago
FWIW, everyone and their dog (nVidia, AMD, ARM, Qualcomm, etc) announced support for VP8 when WebM launched in 2010 too ( http://blog.webmproject.org/2010/05/introducing-webm-open-we... ). Yet, hardware accelerated
842.
by pseudosavant 12y ago
The lack of civility and humanity on the Internet can be astounding. You are a neanderthal if you think it is ok to heckle (at best) or threaten (at worst) women in tech.
843.
Show HN: Homemarks - the homepage for your bookmarks(pseudosavant.com)
2 points by pseudosavant 12y ago|0 comments
844.
by pseudosavant 12y ago
FWIW, it wasn't enough randomness for me. I was seeing collisions in some trivial code in Chrome that worked fine in every single other browser. It's not like Chrome's Math.random performance is significantly better than othe
845.
Why is Google Chrome's Math.random number generator not that random?(stackoverflow.com)
10 points by pseudosavant 12y ago|3 comments
846.
by pseudosavant 13y ago
I totally agree with your sentiment. But I have to say a 'non-paying customer' isn't a customer at all, by definition. ;)
847.
by pseudosavant 13y ago
+1 for namecheap. You don't even have to pay for anything. I started using DDNS at Dyn and then ended up registering a bunch of domain names. Now I'm going to move them to Namecheap which already does my DNS (for free) and now DDN
848.
Meta “When is it stealing?” Inception.(pseudosavant.com)
1 points by pseudosavant 13y ago|0 comments
849.
Great software is a craft. Are you a craftsman?(pseudosavant.com)
2 points by pseudosavant 13y ago|0 comments
850.
Deploy your websites with BitTorrent Sync(pseudosavant.com)
1 points by pseudosavant 13y ago|0 comments
851.
by pseudosavant 13y ago
The original test isn't really valid for comparing loops and your tests prove it. The for loop on my machine does 248MM ops/sec and the while (with no mutation) does 243MM, but the while loop with mutation is 0.44 ops/sec. S
852.
by pseudosavant 14y ago
It also doesn't crash IE9 on my Windows 7 PC or Windows Phone. I don't think most people have actually tried the page in IE9.