pschanely

8 ms·

31.
by pschanely 11y ago
You should certainly check out the code. It's very ... cute.
32.
User focused language design in Elm(elmbark.com)
3 points by pschanely 11y ago|0 comments
33.
by pschanely 11y ago
You made this? Kudos. Too much quality stuff falls through the cracks on HN.
34.
Ask HN: Which bars are willing to livestream the last alphago game tonight?
1 points by pschanely 11y ago|0 comments
35.
by pschanely 11y ago
Is this the most important human-computer matchup of our lifetimes? Seems like it should be a bigger deal.
36.
Show HN: A database index optimized for custom scoring functions(github.com)
17 points by pschanely 11y ago|1 comments
37.
by pschanely 11y ago
This is amazing . In 1989. And here we are in 2015, looking at data by feverishly flipping arrows in collapsable trees in eclipse. I just don't get it. I am somewhat in love with homoiconicity; perhaps no other revelation in CS mat
38.
Show HN: Proof-of-concept demo of a functional language IDE for touch devices(github.com)
30 points by pschanely 11y ago|1 comments
39.
by pschanely 11y ago
I had no idea this many people cared about this sort of thing! I'll totally follow along. I think there's something real in all this; we just need the right combination of ideas, and perhaps the will to collaborate.
40.
by pschanely 11y ago
Fantastic; I was unaware of row polymorphism, and I'll certainly dig into it deeper. Partly, I intentionally wasn't thinking about the typing because so many incredibly intelligent people are already working on that.
41.
by pschanely 11y ago
It could use a lot more explanation! Or, at least, something more than zero. I appreciate you taking the time to reason it out in spite of that. For the moment, I'm just collecting some preliminary feedback. I owe you some real doc
42.
by pschanely 11y ago
Yes, exactly! Get on those concepts! Or, let me know what you're thinking, and we'll team up :)
43.
by pschanely 11y ago
Yes! Typing is a BIG question here and I think some form of static analysis is going to be a critical piece of the puzzle. Completely dynamic menus I think can make users have to think too much, but it could work if you have static men
44.
by pschanely 11y ago
:) Thanks! I don't really understand why radial menus aren't all over the place, frankly. I think there is a ton of room to adapt popular languages to mobile (and would love it if this inspires someone to do that!) Here, I'm
45.
by pschanely 11y ago
Yes! The title could be better. While researching this, I found an amusing comment: "Reverse Polish notation is so last century" That's probably true. Still, I think it's a fun project. If you're interested in
46.
Show HN: A stack-based pure functional language for touch devices(github.com)
77 points by pschanely 11y ago|19 comments
47.
by pschanely 11y ago
Doesn't this article seem to say that the size of the training set is related to the size of the resulting network? It should be proportional to the number of nodes/layers that the network is configured for, not proportional to t
48.
Combine Your Scores Better(bijection.wordpress.com)
1 points by pschanely 11y ago|0 comments