Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
prophesi
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
57 ms
·
781.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
> "well this is really cool tech, and I am making good money... Not my problem what they do with it" Yep. I've got a feeling this is a sentiment shared among all of the engineers working on shady tech. I'd also add, &
782.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
> Why would any other country use it now? For the same reason people were using it before. Everyone is on Twitter. A much, much smaller fraction are on Twitter-alternatives. That said, I wish them the best of luck, as I hope alternatives
783.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
tl;dr: Author thinks the pipe operator introduces anti-patterns, after not using a pipe operator for 10 years.
784.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
That resulted in delays, not incorrect codes.
785.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
I doubt you're actually having this problem, but if you are, you can add an issue to the corresponding Android/iOS repo.
786.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
Hm, I think your idea of letting the search engine decrypt with your public key would solve the issue of private.sh being the untrusted party. The search engine would be able to send back the encrypted results which private.sh wouldn't
787.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
Most of it's answered here https://private.sh/how-it-works.html So you're using the search engine's public key to encrypt it, meaning the proxies can't decrypt it. But yes, you have to trust the client-s
788.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
What went wrong with their local device transfer solution? Asking as I'm on iOS and have yet to get a new phone.
789.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
> [Unnecessary crude remark]. He made the mess, so if he has any integrity he'll foot the bill for cleaning it up. He [set up a server with a link shortening service pro bono, eating the cost of server maintenance for 11 years], so
790.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
What harm have they "already caused"? Is link rot such a damaging phenomenon that it warrants attacking hobbyists and their not-for-profit public service? Will you help financially compensate their time setting up these fail-safes
791.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
Yep, it's all fluff. They were supposed to reveal more information on the matter in a conference back in October. But we still only have a "technical" paper with nice looking graphs and an unnamed boogie-man.
792.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
I hope the book goes in detail _how_ we are to take back control of our data. One person deleting their Facebook and having good privacy hygiene on the web won't make a dent. Telling others to do the same is futile as well. It's l
793.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
> Unfortunately I'm sure that this game will entertain more than it will highlight horrible industry practices. This statement may still be true, but Cyberpunk 2077 actually did a great job at highlighting the gaming industry's
794.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
Obligatory shoutout to https://thelounge.chat/ Self-hosted an instance two or so years ago and have never run into issues, besides the occasional kick to my reverse proxy. You can create accounts for your friends/famil
795.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
You can log in to your account here https://shop.puri.sm/my-account/ and go to the Addresses tab to edit your current shipping address. I've had to do the same, as a backer since June '19.
796.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
Once the docker installation is documented, it should take considerably less time to self-host. This is for `yarn build`, but perhaps it applies to `yarn install` as well: there's a note in the documentation that says compiling the fro
797.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
Yeah, I didn't understand what the author was trying to get at. Every point made against Firefox, Chrome itself offends to an exponential degree. Their conclusion of using ungoogled-chromium makes no sense, as it still suffers from at
798.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
Maybe they're thinking of RSS?
799.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
> Oh never noticed that. But I think that's because its just annoyance for the people who don't care about privacy. And those who does can just opt out. Opt-out is still a dark pattern. For those who don't care about priva
800.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
It's nigh-impossible to please privacy absolutists, while also hoping to create a consumer friendly (UX-wise) product. It also takes very little for them to toss the baby out with the bathwater. Which is all a bit baffling since we alr
801.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
Previous discussion on Hacktober Fest's PR spam: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24643894
802.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
Most of the PRs I make outside of work and personal projects are to obscure libraries I found useful, which usually have a maintainer whom awakens from their slumber once every few lunar cycles.
803.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
I'm not too familiar with the technique; doesn't pixel tracking still require JS to derive more info from the visitor beyond just their IP address?
804.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
Yeah, if it were a violation of an _open source_ license, then the parent comment would make more sense. Microsoft's love for open source is surface level; they love how easy it is to embrace, extend, and extinguish.
805.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
Because, given the current stats shown here on mail-in voting, most of OP's generation has not voted. And so they're hoping they'll at least be voting in person.
806.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
Sort of; the underlying WebRTC protocol WebTorrent uses encrypts the data in transit, and the data never hits the server. Downside is that the sender, or someone else who has completed the torrent download, must keep the page (or their WebT
807.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
Would this also apply to forcing users to enable location for content that only partially requires it? In particular, Snapchat has some location-based filters, but even the ones that don't require location (purely cosmetic, rewind, slo
808.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
I'm not sure where the confusion is coming from. The fact still stands that it's an achievement for an open source DIY project to come close to Oculus Go specs. The original comment was asking a rhetorical question to make that po
809.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
Thanks kundan2510! I sent in a submission. Your API endpoint worked really well for me in the past, so your service will certainly take precedence.
810.
▲
by
prophesi
6y ago
Wow, this is perfect! It even has a Unity plugin. I'll certainly give Resemble a whirl.
More ›