prolikewh0a

16 ms·

91.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
With unemployment this low there are plenty of entry level jobs people can get into in every city in the country. I live in Seattle and I see people out begging to give people entry level/beginner jobs by the light rail stations and al
92.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
You can also purchase practically the same exact phone for $159. It's an Android One phone as well. Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite. Snapdragon 625 w/4000mAh battery and a higher resolution screen, dual SIM, expandable SD to 256GB, smaller notc
93.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
Was it really news? I heard 4 months ago that this was going to be around DC for their coming cozy relationship with the military industrial complex. Everyone could see it coming. Amazon sure won't be doing that city any favors when it
94.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
It's not like those same complaining fans aren't going to all play it and throw endless money at microtransactions. Remember COD:MW2 protests? https://kotaku.com/5403286/what-modern-warfare-2-boycotters-...
95.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
>Number of people arrested for a marijuana law violation in 2017: 659,700 http://www.drugpolicy.org/issues/drug-war-statistics Yeah, I'm not going to even bat an eye about millionaires and billionaires going to
96.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
I disagree. It's time to start setting an example for white collar crime.
97.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
Why does Facebook get to tell me what's false and not? I'm an adult, I can handle it and research validity myself. Why is it making decisions to what I can and can't see? It's like they're the thought police. Why ar
98.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
>Facebook said this amounted to the most domestic pages and accounts it had ever removed related to influence campaigns. They don't want some things even if they're operated domestically by Americans , but it looks like per
99.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
Why is this an allowed form of propaganda but other things aren't? If you take a step back out of the US "two" party system, it's just Facebook propping up the status quo. Why are Republicans and Democrats allowed to adv
100.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
Late Stage Capitalism.
101.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
Why do only the rich get to live in sprawling nice populated and interesting areas? It's literal segregation.
102.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
They wouldn't build 1 million apartments, for one, Apartments would likely be built at a slower rate than people moving there. Two, as seen in Seattle, only housing for the already wealthy is built. There is tons of demand for low inco
103.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
It's been culturally significant since 1939 and still is. There are still packed shows there almost every night. Music is one of the few places Seattle really has culture. >Founded in 1939,[4] the Showbox has hosted a diverse offeri
104.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
You only have the stresses of major homelessness and an extremely large heroin/meth problem, directly due to the endless growth Amazon and other large companies had on this city, with the "top minds" of Seattle having absolut
105.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
Does that private equity lobby state & local governments to use these machines? Probably.
106.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
It's not just consumerism. What doesn't cost money? Walking around?
107.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
>As long as my boat is afloat, I care not about yours. Everything that's wrong about the USA right here.
108.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
That doesn't answer my question. People have always weaved their own safety nets and saved, but if this is becoming common in USA to spend almost nothing and live frugal, how can this system stay afloat? Another point that's prett
109.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
Ok, but you still need people to buy things. If they're only saving, there's no demand for products. Capitalism requires people to consume.
110.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
Isn't this really bad for a capitalistic system? You need people to spend money and buy things that aren't just rent and basic food.
111.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
For example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnhHzzbqPI4
112.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
>what confidence should I have that it is accurate? They provide no example accounts either, so you will never know if it's accurate. It's entirely possible they deleted legitimate accounts of real individuals at the behest of
113.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
>Twitter is being brazenly used as a propaganda tool by terrible actors with terrible agendas. It's infested with strange accounts of dubious authenticity - which I think is fairly obvious looking through the replies to prominent po
114.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
How do we trust that these were "automated" when we have no example accounts or actual evidence?
115.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
There's nothing wrong with it.
116.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
They don't want people to know they're deleting accounts of real people who are simply expressing dissent.
117.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
Still waiting on what terms they would have broke. It's not hate speech, it's not illegal, it's not disturbing.
118.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
>Do we agree that harmful inaccurate information should be screened for and eliminated? What prevents them from removing say, any information about workers rights because THEY deem it harmful? This is a very dangerous road to go down, th
119.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
That's not for you, a company, or political entity to decide though. You have the right to also not vote, and express your political opinion as to why you're not voting, and why others may not want to either.
120.
by prolikewh0a 8y ago
What terms of service would they be violating? There are automated bots all over Twitter. Telling people to not vote is not hateful, it's not obscene, there's nothing wrong with it. It's full on censorship of ideas.

More ›