progx

30 ms·

1. 211.▲
   by progx 4y ago

   That is a good idea, we need then more developers! More jobs for all! :-)
2. 212.▲
   by progx 4y ago

   For me not. In the Pipe example you must read first that something is done with the object and that it will be output at the end. If i read a code and i want to now what it will do, i wanna first read that it will output something. If that
3. 213.▲
   by progx 4y ago

   Services for developers? Good luck!
4. 214.▲
   by progx 4y ago

   SM people enjoy their pain too ;-) Typescript for "Consumer" is great, but as soon as you must write own complex typings, that is everything, but really not a joy.
5. 215.▲
   by progx 4y ago

   Advantage: things like "literal_block: |" or ">" are not necessary with a simple quote. And i really don't know, why in hell they add binary-Data to a configuration language for humans.
6. 216.▲
   by progx 4y ago

   Then they should make quotes necessary in the YAML-specification. Little more to write, but better to validate.
7. 217.▲
   by progx 4y ago

   TOML is good for simple plain structures. As soon as you have more nested structures, you can also use json.
8. 218.▲
   by progx 4y ago

   This one liners lead to unreadable configuration. With tools, the format is not important. But we did not talk about tools, we talk about that humans can easy read and write a configuration.
9. 219.▲
   by progx 4y ago

   I thought he was replaced by Mushi Mushi?
10. 220.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    The most important point is expandability. Did it has an API or is it planned to add an API to extend the editor?
11. 221.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    Slow loading times, 8 bit images, animated gifs, crazy colorful pages, pages optimized for a screen resolution, for a special browser,... no thank you, i stay on the new web ;-)
12. 222.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    "no transpiled language could ever succeed".... TypeScript.
13. 223.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    I don't get it. Why we need a new language, when an Module for a language would do the job too? NIH-Syndrom? Why not just simply pre compile it to specific language modules?
14. 224.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    Boring! That is the problem, nobody want to do such boring things.
15. 225.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    I like this tech "fights" (evolutions). Even if bun will not overtake node, it will make node better. We see this many times with other projects (js/coffeescript/typescript/..., php/HHVM/HPHPc, webpack&#x2
16. 226.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    Wrote some tools in php + html + vanilla js, around 15 years ago, still in use, with ZERO work to maintain them. Wrote some tools in the last 4 years in the new fancy js ecosystem, and have to update them them permanently, migrate to new ve
17. 227.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    Now i know why 99% produces faulty css that make problem on different devices. They rely on systems like tailwaind and think tailwind does everything for them.
18. 228.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    So you wrote super simple components, without any complexity? As soon as you need some customizable componentes, e.g. a Button, you have to write much code with Tailwind. Or what about a consistent usability and UI over your App, you must e
19. 229.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    Tailwind is awesome for those who don't know much CSS or dislike to work with CSS directly, or it is great for teams, that are not able to define general rules. If you know CSS, you have huge problem to use a tool like Tailwind, cause
20. 230.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    People pay for services around this technology. They pay not for the technology itself, cause there are many other provider. Nobody would use Docker or Vagrant, if they use the same pricing strategy as all competitors before. Red Hat Linux
21. 231.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    2 years ago i try to register, not working. Write some mail to support, no response. Hello GitHub CoPilot. Have convinced myself and am also willing to pay for it. I can't understand Kites Argument, that their users did not want to pay
22. 232.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    Most maintainer work on their project, they don't have the time to work permanent on tooling. Esecially when the tools work for them. You don't need always the newest "sht".
23. 233.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    @Microsoft read this article! ;)
24. 234.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    You never had a complex project?
25. 235.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    For simple interfaces it is. But wait until you got complex dynamic things.
26. 236.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    "to spend less time making tsc happy" signed! I feel i spent more time with that than with the development of the code ;-)
27. 237.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    Docsify https://docsify.js.org Astro https://astro.build/
28. 238.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    PECL? PEAR? Composer? ...
29. 239.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    Could this not be a complete replacement for Next, Nuxt, SvelteKit, ... ? https://docs.astro.build/en/comparing-astro-vs-other-tools/ "Both XXX and Astro are frameworks for building websites. XXX does best wi
30. 240.▲
    by progx 4y ago

    This fights spammers, that use own server, but this will not protect from hostile taken computers, that can use their hash power to resolve the captcha.