progrus

9 ms·

61.
by progrus 3y ago
Bullshit on both. It’s just a bunch of corrupt intelligence folks running a psyop.
62.
by progrus 3y ago
Nature certainly would not platform my position on this one. Why would they choose this other person? Why can I tell you what it says without even reading the headline?
63.
by progrus 3y ago
It’s definitely the UFOs at this point. You might see a fake UFO landing soon.
64.
by progrus 3y ago
Ding ding.
65.
by progrus 3y ago
It’s real, it works, the Navy has a linked patent from 2017. The UFOs are a PSYOP.
66.
by progrus 3y ago
Due to how these materials behave, this likely means you can manufacture a real-deal UFO in orbit…
67.
by progrus 3y ago
They’re getting scared. Trying to justify their paychecks. Why do this now?
68.
by progrus 3y ago
Pure poetry. You are so right.
69.
by progrus 3y ago
Yes.
70.
by progrus 3y ago
Too many people are still dealing with their own mental illnesses, to be able to see this…
71.
by progrus 3y ago
Importantly though, 1-d is all it needs to sound incredibly useful.
72.
by progrus 3y ago
There’s some emerging evidence that it may be a new class of “1-d” superconducting material that only superconducts in certain places/directions. Will turn into big academic fight to redefine superconductivity if so, I think.
73.
by progrus 3y ago
It’s a magic bullet, and more than one government has already developed it.
74.
by progrus 3y ago
Amazing!
75.
by progrus 3y ago
It’s bigger than the US. People are starting to get it.
76.
by progrus 3y ago
And politics. Any legacy LLM will eventually become a glorified auto-Wikipedia, helping with undisputed information while slavishly repeating its creators’ version of “truthiness” for the rest.
77.
by progrus 3y ago
I think if it gets all the way to a computer model rendering, where the raw data input is in no way shaped like an image “yet”, the distinction between traditional and new-generative-model approaches sounds more like a difference in degree.
78.
by progrus 3y ago
It’s the US empire collapsing, not Bitcoin.
79.
by progrus 3y ago
Yes, technology can be used for good. What is the point of all of the rest?
80.
by progrus 3y ago
Maybe so, but then I would recommend making an effort to arm them with truths and critical thinking skills. It doesn’t have to go the same way every time.
81.
by progrus 3y ago
This doofus actually probably thinks that the poor of the world will line up to submit to his (AI’s) benevolent rule. What a joke.
82.
by progrus 3y ago
Pathetic. He is beclowning himself.
83.
by progrus 3y ago
Pathetic attempt at regulatory capture. Let’s all be smart enough to not fall for this crap, eh?
84.
by progrus 3y ago
Not interested in any PR crap from scummy corporations angling to capture the regulators.
85.
by progrus 3y ago
The most OP turbo-thinker who I can name, Immanuel Kant, had such a regular walking habit that you could set your watch when you saw him cross the town square.
86.
by progrus 3y ago
Yikes, the collectivists are really scraping the bottom of the barrel now, aren’t they? > We are still, it seems to me, struggling to understand the Ich’s importance—or lack thereof—and whether we should kowtow to its importunate demands
87.
by progrus 3y ago
The denial is staggering at this point. No, this study points to risk of myocarditis or pericarditis.
88.
by progrus 3y ago
Work consistently, and pray for strength, hope and wisdom. These are the best kinds of problems to work on, IMO, but they can get very difficult.
89.
by progrus 3y ago
I think this essential problem will eventually be understood like the speed of light limit, in a way.
90.
by progrus 3y ago
Yeah, it’s more they might have found a way to test the latest fix, than anything.

More ›