programjames

17 ms·

481.
by programjames 3y ago
You're not making any sense to me. How did you get from "not famous" to "must not being a great programmer"?
482.
by programjames 3y ago
This is still years away from mass production. The process takes hours at very high temperatures to make a single layer.
483.
by programjames 3y ago
Where did they claim to make a chip? It seems to be just a single epigraphene layer.
484.
by programjames 3y ago
Normalizing flows and neural ODEs are becoming a bigger thing, and they do involve some more heavy maths.
485.
by programjames 3y ago
I've probably read 100 ML papers. They're pretty bad. Even the most cited ones like Adam, Attention, and Latent Diffusion are messy, unclear, or just straight up wrong at times. Adam - Their algorithm is inefficient. Their paper c
486.
by programjames 3y ago
It'd be interesting to see a diffusion model for this.
487.
by programjames 3y ago
How would you build a semantic search engine that can also take rules, e.g. "AI papers with the word 'transformer' in them."
488.
by programjames 3y ago
Or, users can check their passwords against known-compromised lists. It's not on them to hold users' hands and check for their mistakes.
489.
by programjames 3y ago
You can do holomorphic encryption.
490.
by programjames 3y ago
This is basically how you win every CodinGame Spring/Fall Challenge, though you check many paths in parallel (beam search) instead of a single at a time (A*).
491.
by programjames 3y ago
Oh my, that was the first thing that I came to complain about here. The type setting is pretty awful, it makes it very difficult to read.
492.
by programjames 3y ago
I love this paper. It reads very much like "this is what we did, and we want to help others do it too." Also, the section "Remark on Novelty" is golden: "OpenVoice does not intend to invent the submodules in the mod
493.
by programjames 3y ago
One thing I really like about Verilog is explicit register widths. I want to be able to work at the individual bit level, something that Python (and even C) are not very good at. Is Chisel decent for efficiency?
494.
by programjames 3y ago
You can hook it up to a monitor and stream the graphics over HDMI. And yes, there are ways to simulate Verilog
495.
by programjames 3y ago
Look at the author list... Dirk Englund. What do you mean by "no"? Do you mean, not that paper (that neither of us linked because there are probably several on matrix multiplication) but instead this other one that also has opti
496.
by programjames 3y ago
No, they're poor at explaining. Have you read the Adam paper? The key concept is the signal to noise ratio, but it's only mentioned on the third page in a paragraph that nearly covers the screen.
497.
by programjames 3y ago
I too "read Vaswani et al. (2017) multiple times, carefully, and was quite unable to grasp what 'attention' was supposed to be doing. (I could follow the math.) I also read multiple tutorials, for multiple intended audiences,
498.
by programjames 3y ago
I'm not a researcher here, but I'm pretty sure Bayesian neural networks are realizable with quantum computers, which is a substantial "quantum advantage".
499.
by programjames 3y ago
"While initially the work will be converting from classical to optoelectronic hardware for matching current operations, such as MIT's work this year," I'm pretty sure you're talking about mean Dirk Englund's ph
500.
by programjames 3y ago
Yep, just this year they announced a whole lot of money for quantum networking, and I'm sure the rest of quantum computing gets even more.
501.
by programjames 3y ago
This paper is horribly written. It's like the authors are trying to sell me on them as researchers, instead of helping me understand their research (y'know, the entire reason journals got started??). An entire section for "st
502.
by programjames 3y ago
This... doesn't seem to do anything special? Everyone already knew it was bad to "batch" ODEs by making them bigger, e.g. in "Neural Ordinary Differential Equations" (the paper that introduced neural ODEs): > One
503.
by programjames 3y ago
Thanks for the corrections
504.
by programjames 3y ago
Shor's algorithm and chemical simulations have been implemented on quantum computers, albeit very simple cases (factoring twenty-one, observing conical intersections). I don't think Grover's has been yet, but it's not mu
505.
by programjames 3y ago
You send a photon with the polarization giving the bit: Basis +: | = 0, — = 1, Basis x: / = 0, \ = 1 You randomly choose a basis for each photon, but don't tell the receiver which basis it is until they receive the photon. They ra
506.
by programjames 3y ago
The reason it doesn't list what the computer is "useful" for is because quantum computers currently don't have a lot of uses. Right now, it's mostly: - Fourier transform in log(n)^2 rather than nlog(n) time. Shor&#x
507.
by programjames 3y ago
I was born after 2,000 and my first language was FMS Logo. Then Java and Python. When I learned about Scratch I hated it.