Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
prof-dr-ir
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
1y ago
The last major European blackout was in 2006: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_European_blackout
32.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
1y ago
Duplicate: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43770337
33.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
1y ago
> no face of P, nor any face of one of the Ti, contains vertices of all three colors That should be 'edge', not 'face', no? Otherwise I do not understand what is happening at all with the examples.
34.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
1y ago
> I'm guessing maybe authors have the ability to hide papers No they do not. In fact, authors cannot even delete submitted papers after they have officially appeared in the (approximately) daily cycle. You can update your paper with
35.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
1y ago
Whenever there is an entropy, it can be defined as S = - sum_n p_n log( p_n ) where the p_n is a probability distribution: for n = 1...W, p_n >= 0 and sum_n p_n = 1. This is always the underlying equation, the only thing that changes i
36.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
That quote is not from the article? And in any case, the fine does not seem to be about the blue checkmarks at all.
37.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
Maybe your friend could reach out to people like Elisabeth Bik, who blogs here: https://scienceintegritydigest.com/ Alternatively, maybe the people behind the Data Colada blog can help: https://datacolada.org
38.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
The New Yorker article from 2023 about this saga is worth a read: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/10/09/they-studied-d... Technical details of the fraud can be found in four famous-ish blog posts
39.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
Did you notice that you are replying to a top-level post which accuses the twice elected president of the USA of acting against American interests? "Having a democratic mandate" is either a valid counterargument or it is not. But
40.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
Bibi's interests != Israeli interests
41.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
So far only one of these two ideas sounded not entirely deranged to the good people of YC. So there is at least (and, perhaps, also at most) a sociological difference.
42.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
> there's a chance neutrinos are Majorana particles. Pet peeve: don't say "are Majorana particles", say "have a Majorana mass term". All spin 1/2 fermions in four spacetime dimensions can be constructed
43.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
> Pretty neat, but definitely watch out for hallucinations. That would be exactly my verdict of any product based on LLMs in the past few years.
44.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
Impressive, but after reading the title I have to admit to being a little disappointed at not finding 10,000 solutions.
45.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
If X1...Xn are independently uniformly distributed between 0 and 1 then: P(max(X1 ... Xn) < x) = P(X1 < x and X2 < x ... and Xn < x) = P(X1 < x) P(X2 < x) ... P(Xn < x) = x^n Also, P(X^{1/n} < x) = P(X < x^n)
46.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
> there's still value in experimenting with it I disagree: some experiments are just not worth our time. I wrote about such a situation three years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26656206 My view is that
47.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
I just want to convey the following point: for the vast, vast majority of physicists the status of MOND is akin to what doctors think of the anti-vaccine theories. The evidence in the opposite direction is simply overwhelming. You refer to
48.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
The trouble is that MOND is just not worth your time. In fact, I would even object to calling it a 'theory' in the first place. MOND is just some wild idea, but a little thought should convince every physicist of its uselessness.
49.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
> they’re considerably higher than one, two or any number of decades ago I do not think that is correct? This actually shows stagnation for at least 2 decades in real median household income: https://en.wikipedia.org/wi
50.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
Very nice explanation by Matt Strassler. I am not sure it is possible to do better without getting into the details of quantum field theory. For those who know quantum mechanics I would add that the oscillations mentioned in the article ar
51.
▲
Dutch Data Protection Authority imposes a 30.5M fine on Clearview
1 points
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
|
0 comments
52.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
The more you know, the more fun the book is. At times the going is tough even if you are a physics professor, because Pais accurately captures the process of discovery which was often messy with unfamiliar equations, strange logical jumps,
53.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
And Abraham Pais' if you know physics.
54.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
> where Durov is a citizen. Why is this important? Do you think he would not have been arrested if he had not had a French passport? I would think that all that matters is that his crimes fall under French jurisdiction.
55.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
> "linear algebra with a uselessly nonstandard notation" Let me chime in that as a physicist (who does use the "pseudo" stuff occasionally) I very much share this opinion. The notation may be really cool and compact,
56.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
Can I ask what you mean with "pretty common"? Do you think more than half of all STEM graduate students had a similar experience as she did? Do you have actual data to support this? I am asking this because HN neems to be so much
57.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
As another 'mainsteam' academic with relevant expertise I think this comment is spot on. I would like to add that Sabine's video on her academic experience was quite a tragic thing to watch. If her allegations are true then t
58.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
In the end tensor fields are sections of a bundle. I insist that calling them "just functions" is simplistic. In fact, I'd say that the complexity of your elaborations kind of proves my point. Note that I deliberately use &qu
59.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
> The "fields" are just functions. I think this is far too simplistic, for one because the values of this putative function depend on the chosen coordinate system. So I completely agree with the comment you are replying to: whe
60.
▲
by
prof-dr-ir
2y ago
First of all, in some sense it is not that interesting of a statement. Whether gravity is a force or not, or whether light is a particle or a wave -- all that depends on definitions of the word force, particle, wave, etc. And nowadays tha
More ›