prodigycorp

6 ms·

91.
by prodigycorp 5mo ago
Someone scold me if I'm wrong but this is really worrying. Threat actors with Github's internal code means a huge acceleration in vulnerability discovery for the one platform where everybody warehouses their code. How is this not
92.
by prodigycorp 5mo ago
WTF, THIS WAS KARPATHY?!
93.
by prodigycorp 5mo ago
i meant everything out of respect for andrej. it's no different from how a visiting scholar can be great marketing for an institution
94.
by prodigycorp 5mo ago
i mean he did publicly openly solicit interest to work at a frontier lab so he can be closer to what's going on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwSVtQ7dziU&t=2870s
95.
by prodigycorp 5mo ago
i wouldn't be surprised if he just becomes a glorified marketer for anthro. im also going to guess that whatever research he does would be free roam research that primarily serves to market the fact that claude was able to help perform
96.
by prodigycorp 5mo ago
this is so funny because it's true. it was a handy library but a lot of the shine wore off when I realize how it actually worked.
97.
by prodigycorp 5mo ago
Perhaps, but I'm commenting on a blog post called "How Claude Code works in large codebases". That's an interesting question to me. I had hoped there was a more interesting answer.
98.
by prodigycorp 5mo ago
My complaint is about how there's not enough information in the blog post. The title of the post is "How Claude Code works in large codebases". 1521 of 18135 characters is dedicated to expanding on the premise of the title. M
99.
by prodigycorp 5mo ago
This is really a zero information blog post. I want to know how they use the LSP to improve their understanding of the code base. Would be great if it was open source for us to review. A post like this should be providing people with some r
100.
by prodigycorp 5mo ago
alphabook
101.
by prodigycorp 5mo ago
I hit both a google QR captcha and traditional captcha today. They're phasing it in.
102.
by prodigycorp 5mo ago
Ok, so we treat it as an act of war. Now what? Attack North Korea? Great, the entire city of Seoul gets shelled within five minutes of your attack and hundreds of thousands of innocent people die. It's very easy to play with lives that
103.
by prodigycorp 5mo ago
This used to be the case, but the changes last month have rendered the Gemini Pro plan completely unusable.
104.
by prodigycorp 5mo ago
I think you can see this one of two ways: you could also consider it a miracle that the qwen models are able to perform so well when being trained on inefficient wrapper code data.
105.
by prodigycorp 5mo ago
Idk how to make it more obvious that you’ve used a vote ring than 15 votes in ten minutes.
106.
by prodigycorp 5mo ago
I hereby propose we rename the HN frontpage to "Claude Customer Support"
107.
by prodigycorp 5mo ago
i run qwen 3.6. you need to drink some settle down juice.
108.
by prodigycorp 6mo ago
Am I the only one who thinks that your stop hook is written extremely poorly? Not only that, but you're writing to the LLM like an abusive human. No wonder it wants to go home.
109.
by prodigycorp 6mo ago
Thank you for sharing this. Not often do you get projects that expand your imagination about what we can do with these models.
110.
by prodigycorp 6mo ago
To me the opus flamingo is waaaay better than the qwen one. qwen has the better pelican, though.
111.
by prodigycorp 6mo ago
He's contributed to improving trust on this forum. And idk if you've ever gotten commercial samples before but he's right, the amount they give you is immaterial to hurting them and can be material to you. Also, he said that
112.
by prodigycorp 6mo ago
I don't think people have been keeping track but OpenAI has been hiring a murderer's row of developers for their Codex team.
113.
by prodigycorp 6mo ago
It was from a techmeme ride home podcast where the host discussed "sources at the company said". I don't remember which day's episode it was.
114.
by prodigycorp 6mo ago
Nah I remember how disgusted I felt trying llama 4 maverick and scout. They were both DOA.. couldn't even beat much smaller local models.
115.
by prodigycorp 6mo ago
the models were objectively horrible
116.
by prodigycorp 6mo ago
Comments trashing this are rightly correct skeptics who remember the benchmaxxing of llama 4. This model was out in the woods as early as like a couple months ago but they didn't release it because it was at gemini 2.5 pro levels.
117.
by prodigycorp 6mo ago
The way you put it, I understand it less. lol
118.
by prodigycorp 6mo ago
So the answer is: no. lol. Remember Llama 4 Behemoth, and how we were supposed to get more great models from it?
119.
by prodigycorp 6mo ago
meta's benchmaxing tendencies are well known. llama4 was mega benchmaxxed, there's nothing that suggests to me that meta's culture has changed.
120.
by prodigycorp 6mo ago
Wow, this song is horribly mastered.

More ›