privong

39 ms·

451.
by privong 8y ago
I haven't heard of anyone doing this as a project, I bet it would be a challenging, and I think it would be awesome for you to try it.
452.
Visual Satellite Observer's Home Page(satobs.org)
1 points by privong 8y ago|0 comments
453.
by privong 8y ago
Have you tried contacting the developers themselves? http://www.bluez.org/contact/ That page links to a sponsors page ( http://www.bluez.org/development/sponsors/ ) so they seem to accept donat
454.
Electricity does not change poor lives as much as was thought(economist.com)
4 points by privong 8y ago|0 comments
455.
Airbus may soon stop making new A380 super-jumbos(economist.com)
2 points by privong 8y ago|0 comments
456.
National Park Typeface(nationalparktypeface.com)
2 points by privong 8y ago|0 comments
457.
by privong 8y ago
> I really wish I'd read these comments and realised the experiment isn't finished before scrolling up and down the article for five minutes trying to find the conclusion. Gwern.net has useful heading information on each page.
458.
by privong 8y ago
> No conclusion? What's the point of doing research or reporting it if you learned nothing? This attitude is (imho) a major problem in research/academia. If you've done research into something you should report it even
459.
Crossing Antarctica: How the Confusion Began and Where Do We Go from Here(explorersweb.com)
1 points by privong 8y ago|0 comments
460.
Prediction markets for Science(citationfuture.com)
1 points by privong 8y ago|0 comments
461.
Machine Learning to Detect Software Vulnerabilities(schneier.com)
1 points by privong 8y ago|0 comments
462.
by privong 8y ago
Lots of discussion here already: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18776883
463.
It’s All Data(overcomingbias.com)
1 points by privong 8y ago|0 comments
464.
by privong 8y ago
The article states that the tomb has been, "untouched for 4,400 years". Other articles (e.g., [0]) have explicitly stated that the tomb has not been looted. [0] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-egypt-archaeo
465.
by privong 8y ago
This blog post is related to Robin Hanson's recent post, "Can Foundational Physics Be Saved?"[0] Hanson has also posted a follow-up in response to the HN-linked post by Hossenfelder. That is "Response to Hossenfelder&qu
466.
Pimutils: coreutils for personal information management(pimutils.org)
1 points by privong 8y ago|0 comments
467.
by privong 8y ago
> I’m willing to believe this, having paid a lot of attention to the topic over the past few years. Can you elaborate on this? Some more information and/or references would be helpful.
468.
by privong 8y ago
Okay, that makes sense and makes me feel better about it. Thanks for responding and clarifying.
469.
Typeset in the Future: The Book(typesetinthefuture.com)
2 points by privong 8y ago|0 comments
470.
by privong 8y ago
> That is like saying ice cream makers should focus on the 'core' tastes, claiming that that is banana and vanilla because you like those. From my point of view, I'm suggesting the ice cream makers should stop trying to m
471.
by privong 8y ago
> Most of those features are optional. So if you don't care about some functionality just uninstall the specific 'App'. That's true, but unless there are new developers joining to create/support these apps the ad
472.
by privong 8y ago
Not only related, but that submission is just a different mirror for the same emailed release announcement.
473.
by privong 8y ago
Interesting that it also seems to handle false positives well: > Among other things, the new method makes it possible to detect "a false sit" (when a dog sits to signal that it has found something). "In traditional signal
474.
by privong 8y ago
> is there really a distinction between ‘>’ and ‘<‘? Is only one really the ‘greater’ than sign? The convention I've always seen is that `>` is "greater than" and `<` is "less than". Reading from left
475.
by privong 8y ago
I see I misunderstood that you were specifically questioning the equivalence for this postulated negative mass. I thought your statement was a more general one.
476.
by privong 8y ago
> That assumes that inertial mass = gravitational mass, which is assumed to be true, not not proven. The assertion has been tested experimentally. Inertial and gravitational mass are seen to be equivalent within the bounds of experimenta
477.
DIY Backpack Base Station (2016)(begriffs.com)
3 points by privong 8y ago|0 comments
478.
by privong 8y ago
> Well, last time someone lighted a cigarette on a plane ... There are also designated non-smoking zones that are not due to immediate (as opposed to long-term) safety concerns.
479.
Man of the Hole(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points by privong 8y ago|0 comments
480.
by privong 8y ago
There was also this one, a bit earlier, "Observing Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays with Smartphones". https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.2895 I (thought I) signed up to be informed of beta releases, but never heard any

More ›