preisschild

3 ms·

31.
by preisschild 1mo ago
> moving furniture Either rent a van or pay a moving company. Its not like you do this every week and it will still be cheaper if you do this every few years than paying for your own car. > or even larger amounts of groceries that are
32.
by preisschild 1mo ago
You might not even need to go through HE. Many ISPs allow you to set your own PTR records / rDNS delegations if you ask them, since this is also necessary to host email servers.
33.
by preisschild 1mo ago
In cities cars have no reason to exist. You can combine better scalable public transit (light rail, subways, trains) with bikes/scooters and you get best of both worlds. Have been living in one for years without a need for a car.
34.
by preisschild 1mo ago
GrapheneOS is a non-profit, publicly naming the actual issues is the only thing they can do to make Google fix those issues. And it is clear that security/privacy is their first priority, not "brand image"
35.
by preisschild 1mo ago
Tbf with all the information that has come to light since then Rossmann and FUTO were also not behaving correctly and it was fair from him to deny coming onto their show (where they have also invited fascists before)
36.
by preisschild 1mo ago
> "Yes, smaller reactors lose economies of scale, but we'll make it up through factory production, standardization and repetition" Why not both? Large Modular Reactors (LMR). You can produce standardized modules in a facto
37.
by preisschild 1mo ago
And what if that actually leads to less open-ness? If I license code under a copyleft license, users are forced to give back their changes to the public. Without copyright they would not be forced to do this, which means less work will be
38.
by preisschild 1mo ago
This would also mean copyleft would not work anymore. Companies would not be forced to release the source code of their modifications of (A)GPL software. I think that would be a great loss
39.
by preisschild 1mo ago
GTK has "native" backends for linux (wayland/x11), but also win32 (windows), quartz (macos), and web. Plus there is an experimental backend for Android https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GTK#/media/F
40.
by preisschild 1mo ago
True but you can skip the net stack completely if you just want to transfer data
41.
by preisschild 1mo ago
You can use USB4STREAM on linux if its USB4 https://www.phoronix.com/news/Intel-Linux-USB4STREAM
42.
by preisschild 1mo ago
Or just hostnames (mDNS configured to resolve/advertise on ipv6 link-local addresses)
43.
by preisschild 1mo ago
> If anything, NAT has saved millions of wildly insecure devices running unpatched old Windows versions from getting pwned the second they connect to the open internet. Its definitely the opposite. People started ignoring security becaus
44.
by preisschild 2mo ago
> US activists that will advise you about anthropogenic global warming for free Yeah but they won't give actual data on how this specifically affects geopolitics
45.
by preisschild 2mo ago
> No warnings or communication of the exception were given. All trust I had in Flatpak was eroded from that moment on This is just wrong. Clients like the flathub website or gnome software show the risk posed by wide ranging access to lo
46.
by preisschild 2mo ago
you might be able to do it via iroh's dumbpipe
47.
by preisschild 2mo ago
Brazil is close with Russia, and Russia does a lot more harm to the world than the US even under Trump.
48.
by preisschild 2mo ago
Habitat destruction is bad actually
49.
by preisschild 2mo ago
What engineering? Him doing mediocre PHP code work in the 90s?
50.
by preisschild 2mo ago
I think you misunderstood. Its people like Lunduke hating on those projects due to their culture war bs
51.
by preisschild 2mo ago
Depends where that funding goes towards, a lot of far right grifters in the linux sphere hate many projects in the linux desktop ecosystem (freedesktop, xorg, systemd, gnome, kde) See for example Lundukes "Woke Software" list htt
52.
by preisschild 2mo ago
Are you seriously acting like every application having full access over other applications is not an actual security issue?
53.
by preisschild 2mo ago
I doubt they care too much. They probably just have customers with applications stuck on a legacy window system. And they pay for that maintenance.
54.
by preisschild 2mo ago
I havent seen a monitor (besides tvs) that has HDMI2.1 but not DP2.1
55.
by preisschild 2mo ago
Yeah but this is for amdgpu and they had DP2.1 support for a while now.
56.
by preisschild 2mo ago
Only Pixels, most other device are ironically locked down a lot more (not allowing custom keys for verified boot) or lack modern security features (like hardware security modules). So you'll have to wait for the mentioned Motorola Flag
57.
by preisschild 2mo ago
Unless you really have a large ethical problem with paying for any google product, I'd just recommend to get one of the previous-gen pixel devices. They are a lot cheaper than the Motorola smartphone coming out.
58.
by preisschild 2mo ago
I doubt that very much. They will always be a lot more expansive than even large (~6.8") single screen devices. I don't see how folds will ever be easier/cheaper to produce than single screen displays.
59.
by preisschild 2mo ago
I just don't see why you would spend more than double (almost 2K USD!) for the fold phones though. I have large screens in my home to watch high quality video content. I do like the Pixel Pro XL series with 6.8" screens though, bu
60.
by preisschild 2mo ago
its simple and it works

More ›