prasadjoglekar

19 ms·

241.
by prasadjoglekar 10y ago
His structural remedy is to remove government from the mix and let the market dictate the price of bandwidth. One thought is that the last-mile problem becomes irrelevant when mobile providers are offering high-speed internet. Whether you a
242.
by prasadjoglekar 10y ago
And, a lot of the content that is watched "not on TV" is still produced by the same people that produce "TV". So, it's TV.
243.
by prasadjoglekar 10y ago
Leaving a loophole will only invite more abuse. If the equity is worth $0 (which it is for all illiquid startups big and small), then it shouldn't count for anything.
244.
by prasadjoglekar 10y ago
The subtitle of the article is: "Democrats' last-minute rulemakings could be easily reversed once GOP takes over." That's the problem with executive rule making - changes in the executive lead to changes to the rules. I
245.
by prasadjoglekar 10y ago
I disagree. The problem was that all journalists (Fox News included) used the polling as an excuse to not actually get out and do journalism. Polls should have been but one input. Instead, because most polls said what all of them wanted to
246.
by prasadjoglekar 10y ago
"You've also got a top marginal personal income tax rate approaching 60% which is nearly twice that of the US and political suicide." That's only true if you count Federal Income Taxes alone. By the time you're done
247.
by prasadjoglekar 10y ago
If it's only an opinion about diversity at the dinner table, then it's not hubris. But if the search for an optimal mix comes from a govt. or quasi-govt. institution then it's no longer an opinion, is it?
248.
by prasadjoglekar 10y ago
There is inequality in city-services, whether private or public. The underlying economics of delivering water or transportation don't change because of ownership. It's just that inequality manifests itself differently. I actually
249.
by prasadjoglekar 10y ago
Perhaps a bit of both? The article cites both humanitarian and military power projection capabilities.
250.
by prasadjoglekar 11y ago
Short answer: Publishers were too weak individually to challenge Amazon's ebook business model (the wholesale version). If all the publishers colluded to stop selling to Amazon, that would be a violation of the anti-trust act. Apple co