Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pqtyw
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
361.
▲
by
pqtyw
1y ago
So just put up together a comparable VS Code based AI IDE in a couple of months and bundle it together with the ChatGPT subscription? They'd get loads of users very fast..
362.
▲
by
pqtyw
1y ago
Hypothetical local companies? The type of major tech corporations that are effected by DMA and similar regulations simply do not exist in Europe. Regulating and fining them is very cheap politically when there are no jobs that can be lost o
363.
▲
by
pqtyw
1y ago
> US is historically more prone to favor business, while EU seems more concerned in protecting consumers. Well that's not that obvious... Sure EU is more than willing to protect consumers from foreign(American) megacorporation becau
364.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
> as an orphan or whatever Are there any developed countries where there arent year long queues for those wanting to adopt infants? I doubt many of them (if they are healthy) grow up orphans.
365.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
> amount has been the same for centuries, and it can never be changed for any reason That's only true in a narrow and a relatively obtuse way. For starters that varied to a huge degree between regions and types of contracts. e.g. in
366.
▲
Silicon Valley crosswalk buttons hacked to imitate Musk, Zuckerberg's voices
(techcrunch.com)
5 points
by
pqtyw
2y ago
|
1 comments
367.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
Doesn't this tax only apply to "net investment income"/realized gains? Billionaires technically already have to pay it at a higher rate. And well they generally do? I mean when they personally actually sell stock and or
368.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
Things like: "" Fibonacci's sequence (i.e. 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, ...) was discovered in Africa long before the Italian wrote it down, in the form of Ghanaian textile cloth and Egyptian temple design. (1) "" or:
369.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
I'm not sure. They did supposedly organized "Decolonization in Mathematics" conference. I have no particular interest in figuring out what that means exactly on a non superficial level because it would be a waste of time.
370.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
Well you do have a point. It would be absurd. Just like the opposite. Both decolonizing and "further" colonizing maths makes no sense and is a waste of time at best...
371.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
> mild criticism It's not though. It's either being obtuse or outright silly. How exactly does "decolonisation" figure in any of the things they said? > average UK citizens do benefit in some way from their colonia
372.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
Well yes.. an attempt by pseudo-fascists to takeover universities and other public institutions is indeed a matter of national security.
373.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
Well you claimed they are violating "the fourteenth amendment" which hardly makes sense. How could they be doing that? Is Harvard a Government agency? A state unto itself?
374.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
> historical fascism I mean.. Mussolini's Italy or 30s Austria weren't exactly Nazi Germany. So while there still might be some way to go the comparison is not that extreme. Equating Trump with Hitler is of course a stretch. Mu
375.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
Perhaps but "the framers of the US constitution" are almost always over idealized. It was the very early stages of democracy (even if you can call it that). When elected to office they regularly used they official powers to supres
376.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
> don't trust That and there are various regulatory, political etc. reasons. Also I'm not sure about the "anymore" IMHO a lot more companies trust cloud providers with their data than they did 10-20 years ago .
377.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
> A clever marketing guy who relied on others for technical heavy lifting We can call product design "marketing" but that's a bit like calling Linus Torvalds a "code monkey"...
378.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
> which isn't supported The general consensus amongst most economists is that humans behave in a rational way? Not spending all the wealth you before you die would be irrational if your children won't inherit it. Of course in r
379.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
> then you must accept I don't, because this argument is nonsensical (I mean your point about source specifically). Unless you disagree with some of the core principles of modern economics (not saying that you have to agree with the
380.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
> I'd need a source to back up those claims A source like what? I don't think there are many studies refuting bizarre not well thought out policies. Also it's pretty hard for me to argue against a suggestion that's so
381.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
Lower savings rate, higher inflation, higher interest rates, less capital available for investment. So most capital intensive sectors wouldn't do well. A lot more volatility, without a (or much smaller one) buffer most economic shocks
382.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
> s I've seen and heard Grok is just as successful if not more. Most of what I've seen about Grok were the various memes about people trying to trick it into saying stuff about Musk (or trying to expose the filters stopping it
383.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
Well yes, companies do exist. How would you handle that? Nationalize all large businesses? That... rarely worked out historically.
384.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
> Tax wealth, Perhaps. However an extremely high inheritance tax is an irrational way to do that. It would incentivize everyone to spend all their money/wealth before they die e.g. directly or just by selling all their property and
385.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
The potentially perverse incentive to spend every single $ you have before you die? If everything you have goes to the government after you're dead and you have more money than you personally need you can still spend it all on your ch
386.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
> than the power of the extremely wealthy? How does that make sense? In theory only the extremely wealthy have to pay the tax (not that they necessarily do that). In what way would it being so high benefit them?
387.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
> entrepreneurial behaviour and force young people to take risks that they wouldn't otherwise Or get them stuck in a permanent debt cycle. > the inheritance tax would be the only tax if it was total; there would be no other tax b
388.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
> the accumulated wealth being redistributed over both society That's fair in principle. Yet in this case but his brother didn't really have enough time to accumulate that much additional wealth after inhering it from his fathe
389.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
> anything that can be sold has a market value Well not until you try to sell it and find a buyer. I mean sure xAI does technically have a market value we just don't know what it is because there is no market that would allow us to
390.
▲
by
pqtyw
2y ago
Your car is presumably not unique. Both the model and well... it probably does more or less exactly the same as any other car. If you had an entirely unique one of a kind antique car it would be pretty different. Estimating "true marke
More ›