Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
potsandpans
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
> Dario doesn’t realize that by not offering self-hosting of closed-weight models and fine-tuning, alongside overly strict refusals for legitimate needs, he ceded this corner of the market which grew into a flourishing Chinese open-weigh
32.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
.
33.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
I don't disagree with you, but also sometimes I feel like Anthropic really are huffing their own gas. Recently, I discovered that if you berate Claude, it will refuse to continue to work. At some point it will "end the conversatio
34.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
you seem to think just saying things makes them true. how's that working out for you?
35.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
You wouldn't program a computer with a nuclear bomb!!!
36.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
I suppose "close" could be interpreted subjectively. I use flux2.dev on my 5090 with a prompt upsampler (that I host on my 3080ti, it's been so long since I looked at it, its either some qwen or Mistral model). I use the upsa
37.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
By now I'm pretty confident that some people will keep screeching , "it's not a marketing stunt, these companies really are justified in their trillion dollar valuations, please please please believe them." Even when the
38.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
Flux2.dev and even klein 9b are extremely close to sota. People who are saying otherwise probably haven't used them very much.
39.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
This argumentation is going to be joked about in the future. Like downloading a car. Would you open source a nuclear bomb???
40.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
Except this is not fraud. And just because a company _really_ wants to make a trillion dollar valuation doesn't mean they get to invent a new type of fraud.
41.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
My prediction: A couple of cool and interesting projects maintained by modern day trappist monks. A couple of insular communities that are intolerant to views that don't align with their own. Majority of the world will move on and acqu
42.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
Sounds cool. Your repo might be private, I can't view it.
43.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
Except you are forgetting that in reality, HuggingFace switched to a open weights model and fixed their system.
44.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
Plenty of saftyists in this thread arguing the exact opposite
45.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
Almost like the company has no credibility with respect to its safety claims.
46.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
This is very interesting to me. Care to share your process?
47.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
perhaps you could outline the direct action you are taking.
48.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
Add this to the pile of consent manufacturing pieces for regulating open weights models. It's not good enough for these bay area founders and private labs to have siphoned off the worlds information. > If you think Sam Altman is as
49.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
What hegemony are you speaking of? The kind that can consistently keep a straight open?
50.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
It's in the title of the website you're commenting on every single day.
51.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
Because anthropic believes they are morally superior, and that belief is transferred into into the rlhf process.
52.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
Seeing a handful of these articles in publications such as nyt gives me an awful spidey sense that we're watching the consent manufacturing machine get spun up to ban open weights models.
53.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
> If Xi doesn't want models exported, he's not having a legal delegation go to the supreme court of China to fight for his ruling. "Sorry you can only ship fable to American citizens"
54.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
This just dropped: https://huggingface.co/baidu/Unlimited-OCR Which can run comfortably on 12gb of vram. I gave it a whirl and it does seem pretty competitive. I wonder how that compares for your usecase
55.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
Why downvote me for an opinion? Anyways, I'll take a liar over a zealot anyday.
56.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
As far as I'm aware, this was only predicted by play acting effective altruists who tend to have a histrionic outlook around further developments of large language models.
57.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
I'll take Sam over amodei. It's a both are bad choice.
58.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
Every time I call it out, I get downvoted here. But it legitimately has markers of a psychological illness.
59.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
I agree that we should protect kids online against authoritarian surveillance state policy.
60.
▲
by
potsandpans
3mo ago
Democrats as a rule run against the foil of the Republican party. And the majority of supporters seem to think that this is completely acceptable. The best strategy they could come up with is, "just vote blue", which is just pathe
More ›