potsandpans

32 ms·

481.
by potsandpans 4y ago
such incredibly devisive rhetoric. it's very clever: tech workers aren't "average" american workers and therefore deserve punishment. the generous interpretation is that you've been so sufficiently propagandized tha
482.
by potsandpans 4y ago
do you think its vigilantism?
483.
by potsandpans 4y ago
there's really no saying. mammals have been around for ~180 million years, so ~112 million before the mass extinction. The dinosaurs were on earth for about 165 million years. Given the relative quickness that intelligence exploded in
484.
by potsandpans 4y ago
you lost me at the cabal of radical feminists
485.
by potsandpans 4y ago
he knows from all the transitions into death hes experienced
486.
by potsandpans 4y ago
its what you get when you have a culture of "I belive in science"
487.
by potsandpans 4y ago
Would not expect to find a post like this on here. My totally unqualified intuition puts me somewhat in the panpsychist camp, that I'd crudely outline as "the brain does not produce consciousness but is more of an antenna that rec
488.
by potsandpans 4y ago
I've found it somewhat offensive / invasive that applications are asking me to disclose my sexuality recently
489.
by potsandpans 4y ago
you're right how dare they.
490.
by potsandpans 4y ago
and what are your qualifications?
491.
by potsandpans 4y ago
or even better: tell them that they did great, but unfortunately requirements have shifted.
492.
by potsandpans 4y ago
i've noticed an uptick recently on hn popular threads with this kind of rhetoric. very odd. maybe i'm just more cognizant of it and its always been this way
493.
by potsandpans 4y ago
I'm specifically referring to you, who's pathetically muddying the waters on some internet forum.
494.
by potsandpans 4y ago
It's quite incredible to see this level of denialism in 2022
495.
by potsandpans 4y ago
ah, interesting. So you have a medically qualified background to back up those claims?
496.
by potsandpans 4y ago
Not even going to make a throwaway. was intrigued by the article, dled it, set up a profile. Was excited to experience this sexual liberation where I could perhaps be an atypical cis guy... It's just tinder for couples and kinks. The r
497.
by potsandpans 4y ago
The FDA should shut you down
498.
by potsandpans 4y ago
I just simply don't trust Wasmer the company. The trademarking and bytecode alliance drama coupled with the over-the-top marketing splash pages and reaching claims ("THE" universal runtime) and attemps to sockpuppet discussi
499.
by potsandpans 5y ago
as someone with limited understanding of how corporations work, i had a hard time understanding who was factually correct in the exchange.
500.
by potsandpans 5y ago
> A programmer with an expensive type system does not write better programs, any more than a novice guitarist becomes a stadium-grade shredder by buying a fancy guitar. I'd expect a more honest and thoughtful analysis from a "s
501.
by potsandpans 5y ago
Couldn't agree more. I want to see a "mostly pure" occurence type system with refinement types and HKTs on a SUBSET of ECMA.
502.
by potsandpans 5y ago
To be fair, these things are so complex and coming at us nearly non-stop that it's hard to actually process them. If only it were as simple as a giant meteor hurling towards us. Instead we get well intentioned scientific journalism tha
503.
by potsandpans 5y ago
they've received plenty of feedback from the PL community. Beads is a fun an interesting project, but the over the top marketing language and hype is a bit silly. The author really is a rare mix of driven PL engineer and overly grandio
504.
by potsandpans 5y ago
> I don't think that the algorithm is sentient... Thats not how I read what the commentor is describing. It doesn't need to be any of those things to display emergent properties
505.
by potsandpans 6y ago
what is an "exotic instrument"?