potato3732842

302 ms·

3361.
by potato3732842 2y ago
Larry Ellison doesn't have to worry about being profiled as an easy mark to contribute toward some government enforcement worker's KPIs (which themselves are frequently the result of less than noble goals) or getting screwed as pa
3362.
by potato3732842 2y ago
Add a 4th one to the list. If they solved the problem people would question their budget.
3363.
by potato3732842 2y ago
>Is there any evidence of the FAA doing this - sitting on applications that they otherwise should process? Leaded avgas replacement is one such example. Pretty much every step was like pulling teeth.
3364.
by potato3732842 2y ago
i.e. a classic case of forgoing potential returns in exchange for portfolio diversity and reduced risk.
3365.
by potato3732842 2y ago
>Because the astronauts and their training are themselves a valuable asset. Magellan, Hudson, Cook and a litany of others were certainly not cheap cannon fodder. Yet they were allowed to take on immense personal risk and risk to their c
3366.
by potato3732842 2y ago
I am sympathetic to the overall argument that IRS man hours available to "do useful stuff" is lower per capita than it used to be but I think your numbers are potentially way off. Everything also got digitized in that time which i
3367.
by potato3732842 2y ago
Putting stops in places they needn't be trains people to ignore them too.
3368.
by potato3732842 2y ago
You only need to train one person to drive to realize there's a really huge gulf between the bare minimum you're legally mandated to do when driving and what you should do to make driving less dangerous and less frequently displea
3369.
by potato3732842 2y ago
The rear ender is guilty by default in the absense of other information. You can always prove otherwise if you have the evidince. Preventing other people from gaming this default to your detriment is arguably the main point of dashcams. I
3370.
by potato3732842 2y ago
That kid's dad is exactly why insurers push the OBD2 dongles and cell apps so hard. The insurers want to know who those people are so they can jack their rate preemptively because there's a non-trivial chance that a) both parties