posterboy

11 ms·

61.
by posterboy 4y ago
> This is not like the Technoviking, as that was about image rights and not slanderous copy Same thing, name rights, as long as its identifiable.
62.
by posterboy 4y ago
It is infuriating how you substitute "ChatGPT" for the entirely hypothetical slander machine of your own devise. It would absolutelt have humoristic value, appeal to emotion notwithstanding.
63.
by posterboy 4y ago
No. If it insults anyone equally, the only imaginable motivation of its creator would be satire, that ought to be free speech protected. If it's trained to insult a particular group of people, then the input must be curated and the war
64.
by posterboy 4y ago
Yeah but no, the implicature still allows copyright without culpability (edited: got that mixed up). The assumption seems to be that the lack of intent in creation, where it is unpredictable, would likewise imply lack of intent to harm. But
65.
by posterboy 4y ago
> If the output of ChatGPT is not copyrightable because it is not created by a human, Isn't compiler output copyrightable?
66.
by posterboy 4y ago
The Professor is in a good position to (decide if to) sue somebody. From the headlines I thought that's what this is about, because otherwise the headline should suffice with Professor minus "Law". Of course there is preceden
67.
by posterboy 4y ago
But this is not phonetic. The Is in "Inglish" are hardly the same in any dialect. And it doesn't solve the problem on the graphematic level. It ought to allow anyone to read the chosen dialect phonetically. But it suffers fro
68.
by posterboy 4y ago
The monopoly on violence is a fundamental concept of state theory. Formulaicly, the people constitute the state and exert power based on democratic principles. Since intelectual property rights do not reflect a democratic process and were r
69.
by posterboy 4y ago
Here's a cthird comparandum for you. Breathing is rather beneficial for literally everybody and not doing it is very detrimental, actually fatal. How do you feel about the slippery slope now?
70.
by posterboy 4y ago
That's a slippery Sloap argument, and an absurd one. The benefits of running to the cardio vascular system are generally seen as a positive, contrary to smoking. The threshold to overdoing it is orders of magnitudes out of proportion.
71.
by posterboy 4y ago
> , one factor is the power balance of incumbent nuclear states, but [*they] does no invalidate the argument for avoiding proliferation. Fixed that for you
72.
by posterboy 4y ago
> #Satisfying_6NF 6th Normal Form? I was taught that 3NF should be enough for all intents and purposes, which now sounds like the quote about 640k memory.
73.
by posterboy 4y ago
German uses seelische Störung certainly in legal context and it sounds very much like it was translated from psychopathie. Notably, a life-sentence is curbed at 15 years but psychological conditions may be incorrectable and require perman
74.
by posterboy 4y ago
Which logic? It's always a matter of availability, balance, justification, right. The justification is there, so your argument is a strawman. It would be more relevant in a direct comparison to gun control, which. Blades are fairly eas
75.
by posterboy 4y ago
I believe the general concensus is that it doesn't because private media companies aren't public spaces, so the company rules. How far the company enjoys freespeech, whether it extenda to their users and who gets to define hate sp
76.
by posterboy 4y ago
> him humiliating strangers who have done literally nothing wrong. Seems to be an opportunity if good faith predicts that they won't do him any serious wrong.
77.
by posterboy 4y ago
This is nice vut not impressuve. We have had Quake Live on the browser years ago.
78.
by posterboy 4y ago
Generally speaking, it shouldn't be used to implement features that the browser ought to handle, like font support. The criticizm does not seem to apply here.
79.
by posterboy 4y ago
Strawman on top of the false scottsman. Nobody said that all Muslims are murderers.
80.
by posterboy 4y ago
Something that everyone can practice has to have a few simple rules that everyone can follow. That doesn't make it an ideology. It is a complex set of intervowen systems that are carried in no small part at the state level, communicate
81.
by posterboy 4y ago
I mean a good part of the selection process in currating systems happens in meat space. Since that's an intelligent agent, the system in its entire does not satisfy the definition of universal turing machine.
82.
by posterboy 4y ago
>... implying that algorithmic attempts at creating such dynamics in the field of artificial life (aLife) are doomed to fail. I guess they are so meta they wondered if a dedicated AI could output an AGI agent, algorithmically. As far as
83.
by posterboy 4y ago
>I've always thought to develop AGI you really need an evolutionary iterative system that can explore an environment with sensory input and reward feedback for actions Like Tik Tok?
84.
by posterboy 4y ago
>It is. There are plenty of more or less practising Muslims who behave perfectly well and are strongly opposed to theocracy. Bit of a false scottsman. Not every Italian eats Tagliatelle and joins the Mafia but it's still an Italian
85.
by posterboy 4y ago
>... her faculty decided it was insufficient. So what would have been sufficient? >That we can have a debate about, but some BS about "western values" and a strawman argument about "submitting" to "superstitio
86.
by posterboy 4y ago
I'm pretty sure everyone is aware that getting stabbed to death is "uncomfortable". I'd certainly not not "give a fuck" if it happened to me because I literally looked at somebody the wrong way.
87.
by posterboy 4y ago
It's not even an ideology if you look at it that way but it is a state religion by design, that has various implementations depending on who's to benefit. It prescribes universal obligations which they have in common. Some o
88.
by posterboy 4y ago
That's an interesting way to put it. There is some interest, no doubt, and there is some potential abusing that information. Since the information was committed knowingly and willingly to the public domain, though I do not know much ab
89.
by posterboy 4y ago
https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=45769
90.
by posterboy 4y ago
Checking is the only reason that hashes are provided.

More ›