Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
positron26
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
91.
▲
by
positron26
11mo ago
The schedule grows small. I have stopped writing new Elisp and will learn CL in order to adopt Lem. A few years back, this schedule included smart voices attempting to exercise some cultural leadership. It was bright, well-meaning, and la
92.
▲
by
positron26
11mo ago
> I think people who kept saying there is no moat in AI is about to be shocked at how strong of a moat there actually is for ChatGPT. Game on. The systemic risk to the AI build-out happens when memory management techniques similar to ga
93.
▲
by
positron26
11mo ago
If the binder that gives you something printable at low temperature doesn't integrate into the final result through chemical reaction, you are almost assuredly going to get a high porosity mess where the binder had to vaporize out. If
94.
▲
by
positron26
11mo ago
Fundamentally, if the nozzle temperatures can't possibly withstand what they are extruding without eroding, we can either: - balance an exothermic reaction (self-propagating high-temperature synthesis) to occur just after leaving the n
95.
▲
by
positron26
11mo ago
Yep. Even just sharing code with any license is valuable. Much I have learned from reading an implementation of code I have never run even once. Solutions to tough problems are an under-recognized form of generosity. This is a point wher
96.
▲
by
positron26
11mo ago
Your 10y estimate must be wrong since my nanorc only acquired these things after the nano maintainer was bullied out.
97.
▲
by
positron26
11mo ago
It's rather as if a passive inbox with no notifications and where deleting implies lower prioritization of similar messages would be quite handy. Everything in that is Email except email has no concept of "hot".
98.
▲
by
positron26
11mo ago
Emacs took a wrong fork in its own metaphor. At length, being able to take code and libraries between production and the editor would be a game changer. While Elisp has design features that make sense, in the tradeoffs, I think it lost to
99.
▲
by
positron26
11mo ago
Unrelated to the article, a lot of my millennials could see web and then mobile coming, focused on web & mobile, and as a result just weren't really participating in C and C++ development. We used terminal applications leftover fr
100.
▲
by
positron26
11mo ago
Agree, looks like an engine disruption. The rotation already exacerbates the flow into that engine. Change in flow geometry gets more smoke in its way when it's already eating turbulent air. We don't know if it just had a disrupt
101.
▲
by
positron26
11mo ago
For skin, a few seconds might be significant. For the spars, not nearly enough time to matter. It's also not at cruise speed slamming into a downdraft or anything. This is about a 1G loading. Negligible for a while. While the fire
102.
▲
by
positron26
11mo ago
> looks like the left wing was damaged by the fire The wings and aerodynamics don't really care if air or air with combustion are flowing around them. Roll is a consequence of the loss of control due to low speed and the yaw of the
103.
▲
by
positron26
11mo ago
No reading is not quite the same as "hot", but I'm sure it did contribute to discerning simple compressor stall to whatever this was.
104.
▲
by
positron26
11mo ago
This puts an impractical amount of faith in the sensor wiring when the whole pylon and cowling are shredded.
105.
▲
by
positron26
11mo ago
There is a dead zone between rejection and successful take-off speeds. We see it hit too often. I think pilot training is playing a factor. A normal rotation kills too much energy. One engine can climb when you have some airspeed and get
106.
▲
by
positron26
11mo ago
bind ^F forward main bind ^B back main bind M-f nextword main bind M-b prevword main
107.
▲
by
positron26
11mo ago
Right after the nano maintainer got bullied out by the FSF, I noticed two bindings got their defaults changed. They never change. I almost feel like it was graffiti, a flex against the old maintainer, a retribution for not doing whatever
108.
▲
by
positron26
11mo ago
> called Usenet and worked offline People must have been pretty smart back then. They had to know to hang up the phone to check for new messages.
109.
▲
by
positron26
1y ago
The vast majority won't switch until there's a 10x use case. We know they are coming. Why bother hopping?
110.
▲
by
positron26
1y ago
When the consumer decides to discover my site and fund federated and P2P infrastructure, they can have a seat at the table.
111.
▲
by
positron26
1y ago
Makes me want to unplug and go back to offline social media. That's a joke. The dominant effect was networked applications getting developed, enabling community, not a shift back to client terminals.
112.
▲
Hierarchy Elevates Social Reasoning
(positron.solutions)
1 points
by
positron26
1y ago
|
0 comments
113.
▲
by
positron26
1y ago
90% search is not 90% ad revenue. If you want to compete with Google, it's easier to make a different kind of popular platform and then sell ads than to compete head-to-head for traffic on search only to... sell ads.
114.
▲
by
positron26
1y ago
Unless they have managed to hide a lot of leverage and debt (not investment), that's a problem for their shareholders if they have priced in future growth. To avoid looping this conversation for the next 2-3 years, we need to get to hi
115.
▲
by
positron26
1y ago
Maybe the most insane tech bubble you've seen. We'll have to wait and see how the superbowl goes.
116.
▲
by
positron26
1y ago
The problem is not demand going away. No margin in a late stage company goes unassailed for long. Intel has nothing to lose. AMD has everything to gain. Untold other players are finding oxygen in various places. Nvidia is smart to use
117.
▲
by
positron26
1y ago
This is still so oversimplified. There's always bellwether products customers buy a lot and get used to. They use those to decide if you are cheap or expensive. Costco hotdogs are about satisfaction. If I can get one good deal or e
118.
▲
by
positron26
1y ago
> amd needs to It's right there. You're whole mentality is about how one company will fix a problem that they cannot inherently have the expertise to fix. Nvidia fixed that the slow way, building a consortium of partners. T
119.
▲
by
positron26
1y ago
While Nvidia's strategic foresight explains why Nvidia is ahead, it doesn't quite capture why the challenge is not something that only AMD can or should tackle alone. The 7,484+ companies who stand to benefit do not have a good wa
120.
▲
by
positron26
1y ago
WSL2. While it's a fair criticism, the underlying issue here is that there aren't enough Windows users who program and upstream things for individual users to get support. Lean on the Linux ecosystem and things are fine. The rea
More ›