porges

11 ms·

61.
by porges 13y ago
Too many of either is unlikely to generate anything interesting, stick to very small numbers.
62.
by porges 13y ago
Xor waves (this has 2 distinct 'phases' before setting down into a nice static pattern): http://wry.me/hacking/Turing-Drawings/#3,3,2,1,3,0,2,0,0,2,3... Escher's hourglass: http://wry.me/hacking/Turing-Drawings/#5,3,3,1,3,0,1,2,1,2,0...
63.
by porges 13y ago
The steady state at the end on a very slow setting is awesome.
64.
by porges 13y ago
Rain on a window: http://wry.me/hacking/Turing-Drawings/#4,3,0,1,1,1,1,3,2,2,2...
65.
by porges 13y ago
Rex is the equivalent of Pex (which is what this is based upon) for regular expressions: http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/rex/
66.
by porges 13y ago
It's better than QuickCheck. It performs whitebox testing - that is, it has knowledge of the code and actively uses this to generate inputs that explore all possible branches.
67.
by porges 13y ago
This way lets you do it for files hosted somewhere you don't have control of.
68.
by porges 13y ago
XSS-Compatible™
69.
by porges 14y ago
On a related tangent, can we please have an operating system that eschews extensions and instead stores the MIME type for each file?
70.
by porges 14y ago
Well luckily for you, the URI is case-insensitive and redirects (301) to the canonical version.
71.
by porges 14y ago
At least 4: https://www.google.com/search?q=afghanastan%20site%3Amilitar...
72.
by porges 14y ago
It would be nice if the errata for each RFC was included somewhere - perhaps in the right margin for the relevant section?
73.
by porges 15y ago
They later changed all the APs back to full power, "to penetrate walls".
74.
by porges 16y ago
For a while there was a Google feature that let you do that, along with up/downvoting results. It got removed though, and I've never read why :/