pompino

18 ms·

271.
by pompino 3y ago
Ironically, many of their software products are bloated and slow as fuck. (There are some that are top class too, but just sayin.. )
272.
by pompino 3y ago
No, none of my coworkers watch netflix movies at work. Its easier to do when remote.
273.
by pompino 3y ago
Can you give us examples of “clear expectations”?
274.
by pompino 3y ago
Or the shift supervisor chews their ear off once a month to get them back on track. Probably easier than hiring/firing a bunch of folks.
275.
by pompino 3y ago
Everyone says that, but nobody actually provides a way to do it that doesn't also piss off the workers.
276.
by pompino 3y ago
It is easier to do all of that when you're remote. Not really a surprise.
277.
by pompino 3y ago
If you want remote work, you join a remote-first company. That is the only long-term solution that is practical IMHO.
278.
by pompino 3y ago
This is going to be a sore point for all workplaces going forward. Naturally each company is different, but from my experience, I have worked for years in a manufacturing company and I personally know people who will jump on remote work onl
279.
by pompino 3y ago
You have to weed out the people who just want to dick-around at home versus people who are actually providing value to society, so the bar is set very high right now.
280.
by pompino 3y ago
There are grants, but you have to qualify for them. https://opensource.guide/getting-paid/ https://www.state.gov/supporting-critical-open-source-techno... https://new.nsf.gov/tip/u
281.
by pompino 3y ago
Its easy to lose track of these complex topics. Anyway another day, another time maybe I can explain it better to you.
282.
by pompino 3y ago
What is the mechanism? I don't see anything in the comment sorry. Maybe state it simply so I can follow along.
283.
by pompino 3y ago
That is a statement of your opinion, but you'll have to make an argument if we are to have a discussion, else I can just leave it be. I have a nice idea about doing fake 'leaks' using known email addresses and forcing mass re
284.
by pompino 3y ago
There is no way to know or verify what is or isn't a real leak, and what passwords are or aren't leaked. We can't settle this in the comments, and I think it's just security theater. 1. User x signs up for Service A usin
285.
by pompino 3y ago
Can you answer my question rather than your own, please? Otherwise we're just going in circles.
286.
by pompino 3y ago
Can you decribe a mechanism to verify that users in an alleged leak are the same users as your own?
287.
by pompino 3y ago
There is no way to verify that the usernames from the leaks are the same person as your users.
288.
by pompino 3y ago
also there is no way to know if the usernames from the leaks are the same person as your own users. otherwise, you’re essentially saying that you have to pick a unique password that nobody else in the world is using.
289.
by pompino 3y ago
>“ 23andMe knew or should have known that many consumers use recycled passwords ” How would they know this?
290.
by pompino 3y ago
Personally, I don't find it "mind boggling", but rather in-line with reality. Large mega-projects usually suffer major delays, massive cost over-runs, complications due to unforeseen events, and are at a high-risk for corrupt
291.
by pompino 3y ago
Amazon tracks the "wrong item was sent" returns to find such items. They outsourced the checking to the customers, but they're eating the cost of processing the returns/shipping. Maybe that is cheaper in the long run?
292.
by pompino 3y ago
Can you give a real-world example? Most code-bases have massive inertia that resists complete re-writes using new features.
293.
by pompino 3y ago
Why do you feel the need to use every single feature? Are you constantly joining new projects that use vastly different features? Most programmers find a handful of features that gets the job done, and keep using them. Your knowledge from 1