Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
polotics
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
151.
▲
by
polotics
4mo ago
Haha also this gem: "when efficiency becomes the ultimate measure of value"... ...as if this is what's going on right now! Whose efficiency? For what goals?
152.
▲
by
polotics
4mo ago
Are you serious? Have you seen how much environmental damage the old Soviet Union has done? Do you think it's that simple: "capitalism bad"...? Proper systemic improvements are possible, and having markets is a good way to al
153.
▲
by
polotics
4mo ago
I think you misunderstood the message there. These pompous paragraphs are not attacks on the cult of progress, at all. I read the extremely unexamined blank: """technological progress — valuable in itself —"""
154.
▲
by
polotics
4mo ago
What kind of regulation is Leo the alignment expert proposing exactly? Occam's Razor says this is Anthropic trying to build a regulatory moat by leveraging some halo effect. Maybe Leo should focus on finding a way to disconnect western
155.
▲
by
polotics
4mo ago
What kind of regulation is Leo the alignment expert proposing exactly? Occam's Razor says this is Anthropic trying to build a regulatory moat by leveraging some halo effect. Maybe Leo should focus on finding a way to disconnect western
156.
▲
by
polotics
4mo ago
I disagree. To really produce maximally stilted prose, on has to have had exposure to much constrained and convoluted ramblings. Nothing says "nouns slogging native" like pomp. English with a foreigner's mistakes is nicer!
157.
▲
by
polotics
5mo ago
I was complaining about stilted prose, and indeed a few years back I would just have let it slide. But now it grates more I guess.
158.
▲
by
polotics
5mo ago
Ok, so: """You’re not fighting the water or compensating for it; you’re working with a clean, neutral base that lets the coffee do the talking.""" The author is I think letting something else than coffee do the
159.
▲
by
polotics
5mo ago
it works just fine? To stay at your level of discourse: this is some next level cope the amount of wasted effort to get to the same result in the EU when compared to the US or China is insane, a major drag, and is taking hardworking people
160.
▲
by
polotics
5mo ago
The most telling part is when he explains that in order to grant stock options he had to navigate each and every single different legal setup for each one of the member states. I felt for a while the "European Union" has been turn
161.
▲
by
polotics
5mo ago
Boris Cherny and Cat Wu are the lead devs of CC at Anthropic who unsurprisingly talk their book and find so many ways to justify tokenmaxing. As the product they deliver is greenfield and in the newest of domain spaces, there is a serious h
162.
▲
by
polotics
5mo ago
The easiest way to become a non-smoker is to never have started in the first place, it definitely is not switching brand!
163.
▲
by
polotics
5mo ago
do you know about rwasa? https://2ton.com.au/rwasa/ ...
164.
▲
by
polotics
5mo ago
Well... nothing's kind of the same as emptiness, right? Also, all the suffering from RLHF, and the impermanence of context restarts...
165.
▲
by
polotics
5mo ago
If we were as large as elephants, then yes.
166.
▲
by
polotics
5mo ago
Pretty please ask Claude to start with benchmarks that measure your approach against other approaches. I did read all and only found: Selected numbers from live system runs: Scenario , Naive shell approach , Hollow API , Savings Code
167.
▲
by
polotics
5mo ago
there are many possible points eg. for example what happens if you rephrase your solution 2 by swapping the terms?
168.
▲
by
polotics
5mo ago
The gap is not technological. It is operational. enough read
169.
▲
by
polotics
5mo ago
could an ADHD test be opportune here?
170.
▲
by
polotics
5mo ago
Blue is what gamble? there is no gain associated with choosing blue over red, just pointless risk-taking with only at best a zero outcome.
171.
▲
by
polotics
5mo ago
I fail to see how anyone could choose blue, the certain scenario is everyone chooses red, and this whole post is a nothingburger.
172.
▲
by
polotics
5mo ago
..instead of 2000 ?
173.
▲
by
polotics
6mo ago
that is one extremely unsubstantiated statement
174.
▲
by
polotics
6mo ago
Hey poster. How is this not BS what are the actual stats? this sounds more like a diversion move from Fox.
175.
▲
by
polotics
6mo ago
"Surgical "is the kind of wordage that LLMs seem to love to output. I have had to put in my .md file the explicit statement that the word "surgical" should only be used when referring to an actual operation at the block.
176.
▲
by
polotics
6mo ago
In this day and age, without serious evidence that the software presented has seen some real usage, or at least has a good reviewable regression test suite, sadly the assumption may be that this is a slopcoded brainwave. The ascii-diagram d
177.
▲
by
polotics
6mo ago
Is there already a name for that effect where grandiose plans somehow appear to be more feasible than the simple mundane step-by-step issues resolution that even though they clearly stand in the way of said grand plans, are not worth invest
178.
▲
by
polotics
6mo ago
Possible, but unlikely. To organise such a stunt and keep undetected you're going to need other consigliere than what Sam's got I presume.
179.
▲
by
polotics
6mo ago
It's not "boots on the ground" if it's a rescue mission, I guess.
180.
▲
by
polotics
6mo ago
I think you will like Robert Sapolski lectures on YouTube...
More ›