politician

6 ms·

31.
by politician 3mo ago
My guy, that's actually how fires are stopped. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firebreak https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled_burn
32.
by politician 3mo ago
Well this is ridiculous. Literature or music?! No, learning to code is still worthwhile because the AI cannot do useful abstraction well at all . If you don't know how to code, then you'll fail to build useful tools and useful re
33.
by politician 3mo ago
As others have commented, this is an obvious application of event sourcing. It's irritating to see the claim of "deterministic replay" in the abstract along with the caveat "we can't actually do deterministic repla
34.
by politician 4mo ago
Dario quit OpenAI to hype the AI apocalypse for quick cash and attention. Then, he walked right into an obvious crisis with the Pentagon by continuing to try to play both sides of the AGI doom story that even his own AI would've pointe
35.
by politician 4mo ago
Try to automate the adversarial PR review-rebuttal loop "for productivity", so the back-and-forth between the AIs can run over night.
36.
by politician 4mo ago
I think this is why reasoning chains and reasoning chain verifiers are so important. We need to be able to see an argumentation, not just an answer. The paper below goes into this in more detail. HeavySkill: Heavy Thinking as the Inner Skil
37.
by politician 4mo ago
Hahaha, ok yeah I see where you're coming from. It helps me to think about it like a different type of function call. We've got normal functions, async functions, there's a Go project that turns HTML templates into "tem
38.
by politician 4mo ago
Hey Joe, I think the solution to your problem is in your post. You said that when you were tracking your time it killed your idea, and that when you stopped tracking your time you became unfocused. Try letting AI classify your idea into a t
39.
by politician 5mo ago
It's clear that you understand that releasing a schema with this much documentation makes the AI-assisted reverse engineering loop trivial. I'm interested in understanding why I should trust/use/pay for your hosted runti
40.
by politician 5mo ago
This doesn't make sense as a rebuttal. Article is OK with people moving uncontrolled in/out/around Europe. Article is NOT OK with data moving uncontrolled in/out/around Europe. It's stupid. It's quintessen
41.
by politician 5mo ago
Which is mightily funny because in the opening paragraph the article equates "anti-free movement" with "problematic baggage". It's a problem if people can't move freely in and out of Europe, but not data -- tha
42.
by politician 5mo ago
"ethical" is not a word that carries the connotation of a universally agreed upon set of behaviors. Different peoples, groups, and cultures vary in what they consider acceptable behavior.
43.
by politician 5mo ago
I wonder how many gallons of polluted wastewater are discharged per day by overseas refineries. Does anyone know where Tesla stacks up in the global list of lithium refiners?
44.
by politician 7mo ago
_underscore_ for italics conflicts with most identifiers in most languages. Markdown was created in an era before the web had easily used components for structural syntax highlighting (tree-sitter) and where reliance on regex-based approach
45.
by politician 7mo ago
I think we'll be able to quantify sentiment from the data, and I look forward to doing so. There's a few other datasets that I want to look at such as whether there is evidence of participation suppression via rate limiting on a p
46.
by politician 7mo ago
This is great. I've soured on this site over the past few years due to the heavy partisanship that wasn't as present in the early days (eternal September), but there are still quite a few people whose opinions remain thought-provo
47.
by politician 7mo ago
You’re not missing anything. I’ve worked with many developers that are clueless about error handling; who treat it as a mostly optional side quest. It’s not surprising that folks sees the explicit error handling in Go as a grotesque interru
48.
by politician 8mo ago
In your understanding of the constitution, is the executive branch subordinate to the other two branches?
49.
by politician 8mo ago
The OP said that they kept what they liked and discarded the rest. I think that's a reasonable definition for signal; so, the signal-to-token ratio would be a simple ratio of (tokens committed)/(tokens purchased). You could argue
50.
by politician 8mo ago
"Most of the code gets discarded." If you don't mind sharing, what's your signal-to-token ratio?
51.
by politician 8mo ago
This is a decent approach. My concern with TDD is that writing tests necessarily implies designing an API upon which those tests operate. Here, the agent is instructed to "not write code, write tests", and yet, in doing so it defi
52.
by politician 8mo ago
Bingo. You don’t have to read much into this if you remember how the DoD uses the word trust. In their world, a "trusted" system is one that has the power to break your security if it goes wrong. So when they say "unrestricte
53.
by politician 8mo ago
No individual, whether a colonel or a CEO, has inherent authority over national security decisions. Authority flows through democratic institutions. A contractor can choose whether to participate, but national defense policy is determined b
54.
by politician 8mo ago
The posters question was itself a deflection - and your response is moral blackmail. Why don't you answer my question? Why are you deflecting? See how that works?
55.
by politician 8mo ago
Unlike Europe, the USA is not a technocracy. If you want to learn more about the 3 branches of government and the scope of their powers, ask your AI.
56.
by politician 8mo ago
Are you an American? Do you understand that your safe easy life depends on a mostly autonomous nuclear deterrence capability maintained by the military you oppose? Deeply think about why you still have right to free speech, and what it take
57.
by politician 8mo ago
"This has never happened before." US could compel Anthropic to act; simply not doing business with them is restraint, not escalation.
58.
by politician 8mo ago
This is ridiculous. These aren't unreasonable demands and the government has tools to compel tech companies to support the country regardless of any "collective action" shenanigans -- ask your AI to tell you about the Defense
59.
by politician 8mo ago
I simply do not understand why Americans tech companies and their employees will hew and cry about supporting the military. For those of you who support their position, have you ever stopped to consider that your safe, comfortable lives of
60.
by politician 8mo ago
Wow, I never bother with using phrases like “deeply study this codebase deeply.” I consistently get pretty fantastic results.

More ›