polishTar

13 ms·

1. 121.▲
   by polishTar 10y ago

   There's a number of tradeoffs to be made between internal secrecy/silos and trust/openness in any company, and google tends to lean heavily towards trusting their employees when it comes to corp data + resources, designs, str
2. 122.▲
   by polishTar 10y ago

   Large companies aren't always right, but they're not always wrong either. Snap has competent engineering execs that have built a very strong company. I would have a hard time believing that they haven't put way more thought
3. 123.▲
   by polishTar 10y ago

   That's anecdotal evidence that isn't at all reflective of reality. Some stats about Facebook for Q3 2016: MAU (monthly active users) - 1.79B (up 16% YoY) DAU (daily active users) - 1.18B (up 17% YoY) Revenue - 7.01B (up 59% YoY) N
4. 124.▲
   by polishTar 10y ago

   They're only required to provide information that is "pertinent to compliance...". The question is whether or not the private contact details of tens of thousands of employees and ex-employees is pertinent. Google thinks not.
5. 125.▲
   by polishTar 10y ago

   The OFCCP is now demanding Google provide names and private contact information of tens of thousands of employees and ex-employees (some of which haven't been been associated with Google for years)[1]. Unless the OFCCP can give a real