poelzi

17 ms·

121.
by poelzi 11y ago
That is exactly which brought me to the BSM-SG model. When nothing seems to fit well and the physics appear stranger and stranger, you should ask yourself: did we do everything right ? Did we do some mistakes in measurements ? Do we have so
122.
by poelzi 11y ago
The universe does not expand: www.cosmology.info/newsletter/2014.05.pdf I follow the BSM-SG model in which dark matter/dark energy is absolutely clear what it is and how it functions. The illustration is even a bit similar to
123.
by poelzi 11y ago
shrug . mostly based on theories and ideas, but hey what: not all 4 of the generally made assumptions about the event horizon can be true at the same time. Of you stop assuming the proton is ultra small and the electron is probabilistic ju
124.
by poelzi 11y ago
maybe its like SOS and stands for nothing, at least at the beginning. It was used because it was easy to morse and not used ;)
125.
by poelzi 11y ago
I'm absolutely sure, that Einstein would have gone with the BSM-SG model. Unfortunately traveling back in time is impossible (from the BSM perspective). Because the BSM model is the hacker approach to physics. If you can't unify a
126.
by poelzi 11y ago
Neutrinos are made out of 6 prisms and they normally decay into 4 prisms. Those build up the grid structure of our vacuum. another problem with MOND is, that it is in my opinion and a friend of mine that is more deeply into logic, not a cla
127.
by poelzi 11y ago
I loved netstorm. One of the best games ever, thank you :)
128.
by poelzi 11y ago
Dark Matter is apparently 84.54% of our Universe. If this is so abandoned, why did the millions we spend looking for it did not yield anything ? Lets see: http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0612201.pdf http:/&#x2F
129.
by poelzi 11y ago
just stupid
130.
by poelzi 11y ago
I would so love to think/speak ithkuil, but knowing that nobody seems smart enough made me learn lojban instead ^^ .xu do tavla fo la lojban
131.
by poelzi 11y ago
The whole reputation dependency is highly problematic. It puts people in spotlight that produce a lot of papers which get some spotlight, but serious scientists that put a lot of time and thought into one paper and only produce a dozen in t
132.
by poelzi 11y ago
This wouldn't happen with lojban ;)
133.
by poelzi 11y ago
I would also like if scientists which no understanding of logic apart of mathematical one and no understanding of philosophy of science would stop to call them self scientists (both are required to define truth value). Its not going to happ
134.
by poelzi 11y ago
What should they do ? Mining minerals ? Nobody mines minerals in on a planet, you use asteroids for that. Microgravity will make separation easier. Occupying another planet ? Everybody with understanding of history knows that it does not wo
135.
by poelzi 11y ago
Correction: "No signal that we use Detected from KIC 8462852" And ? Nobody with good physical understanding uses Hertz EM waves for communication except emergency broadcasts if he is clever. Assumptions over assumptions and not lo
136.
by poelzi 11y ago
blablabla, everything is fine, blablabla. blabla terror blablabla... i wonder if this guy ever questions the stuff he is told and puts some critical thinking to sunshine. Guess from what he wrote: no.
137.
by poelzi 11y ago
I usually get to work at ~11.30 am, but sometimes I still go to bad very, very late... ^^
138.
by poelzi 11y ago
theorems and bad assumptions. first: speed of light is derived from 2 energy states and affects ONLY matter with rest mass. Once you understand all the energies involved it becomes clear where the GR effect comes from. Einstein never said t
139.
by poelzi 11y ago
there is a classical explanation for it, look into the BSM-SG model from Stoyan Sarg. Most brillian physicist ever lived. If you find a error in his theory, tell me, because for me it makes sense and everybody I asked just ignores him but c
140.
by poelzi 11y ago
I'm happy that BSM-SG replaced QM for me :) They are looking at huge, huge objects and think they are fundamental particles and wonder why it behaves strangely... apart from fundamental errors they have.
141.
by poelzi 11y ago
Except for the big bang bullshit, very beautiful. The effects of our rampage against the planet in the disaster graph is so nicely visible. Goodby humanity, you had a chance but you blow it...
142.
by poelzi 11y ago
his physical understand is wrong. just because common physics does not understand the ZPE(s) (zero point energies (there are actually 2)) gives very wrong perspective on our physical world. Once you understood that 1 cm³ contains ~ 244 time
143.
by poelzi 11y ago
I just sitting @ the c3d2 hackerspace in dresden germany which is located in the old robotron building ^^ - but never saw one of those machines in person. No idea if here are still some in the building, guess not.
144.
by poelzi 11y ago
Of course, both parties like status quo because both benefit from it. They just don't realize that the empire is soon dead, the question is, will the fall be bad or catastrophic.
145.
by poelzi 11y ago
This is in science the same: You can adjust a common accepted theory a bit, but putting everything upside down, even if it's logical and makes sense, will not get accepted. Really sad :(
146.
by poelzi 11y ago
OS development takes time and he clearly states this will change, criticizing such a young project with halfquotes is unfair and discouraging for the developers. shame on you. I'm waiting for OS development to start up in rust as it is
147.
by poelzi 11y ago
Last try was in maybe ~2012. I learned from a collegue that if the hard drive implements barriers incorrectly, this can cause easy XFS corruptions. Maybe this was the reason, especially SSD firmwares are very complex these days...
148.
by poelzi 11y ago
Mathematical logic has more freedom then classical logic. I personally describe classical logic, that when its intuitive logical for you, its classical. Everybody into real logician would scream now, because that is not the definition of co
149.
by poelzi 11y ago
xfs is my first choice for data loss. Poweroff in suspend and the root fs was bricked, twice. Never ever again.
150.
by poelzi 11y ago
Of course you can do a integral over time for example, but you logically understand in the process that its only a virtual dimension in this case, not a real euclidean one. Your spin 'dimensions' still reside in 3 euclidean dimens

More ›