Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pms
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
pms
2y ago
The open-sourcing of the X's feed algorithm is a typical Musk's smokescreen. First, while the code was open sourced, the configs and data that determines its behavior wasn't. Any researcher that has some knowledge of the matt
62.
▲
Another million users joined Bluesky today – could Bluesky spike spark end of X?
(news.sky.com)
21 points
by
pms
2y ago
|
13 comments
63.
▲
by
pms
2y ago
That's the kind of products Palantir develops, but is it confirmed that they developed Lavender and "Where's Daddy"?
64.
▲
by
pms
2y ago
Are we supposed to believe in the usefulness of AI as if it was a matter of belief? The one and only Matrix to come?
65.
▲
by
pms
2y ago
Great points! The only thing I'd add: I don't think the responsibility for lack of automation is solely on these other industries. To develop this kind of automation, they need funds and IT experts, but (i) they don't have fu
66.
▲
by
pms
2y ago
You're comparing a satirical video from 2015 with a 2024 marketing video... Not exactly a fair comparison...
67.
▲
by
pms
2y ago
There is a difference you neglected: nobody optimizes our society to eat less vegetables, or read less books, or to disregard new year's resolutions, so the responsibility is on us, whereas social media platforms do optimize for engage
68.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
Maybe you and me are not like that, but most iPhone users are like that and that's what Apple wanted from the start (to artificially discriminate for the good of their business)?
69.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
It sounds to me the exact opposite. Apple's bad-faith compliance will backfire. Enough of this.
70.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
I bet OpenAI and MS do the same, but people have a positive perception of them due to the massive chatGPT hype wave.
71.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
The board had the right non-profit long-term focus, but it didn't have the willpower to communicate and realize their vision. Ilya is a wonderful scientist, but not a great leader.
72.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
I think they didn't anticipate sucha a large backlash, especially from investors. They felt the backlash threatens OpenAI, both its non-profit and for-profit arms, so they reverted their decision, which in my opinion was a mistake, but
73.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
Until you realize that it doesn't work well with less popular videos (any items really), because "Large Language Models Struggle to Learn Long-Tail Knowledge" [1]. [1] https://proceedings.mlr.press/v202/k
74.
▲
Guardrails of LLMs thwarted by appending specific strings to prompts
(nytimes.com)
1 points
by
pms
3y ago
|
0 comments
75.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
I don't think it's that crazy if you trust the government to use these capabilities in the intended ways, that is to catch serious crimes. The US is a very specific country, because here people have very low trust in government an
76.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
Are you advocating for normalization of mistakes and bad driving practices? If self-driving corresponds to bad drivers, then is it useful?
77.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
If self-driving cars are really safer than human drivers, then tech companies need to prove it by releasing more data than necessary, rather than less. Why won't they release sufficient data instead of forcing the city to gather their
78.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
They are required to report every accident, but not every mile these cars drive and in what conditions, so this data is unfortunately insufficient to make valid comparisons with human drivers... Really, the problem is the transparency of te
79.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
Sounds like an extremely arrogant and biased comment showing the blind righteousness of tech and its followers. How else can tech build trust with the public than via transparency? Think about this for a moment.
80.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
I didn't make that assumption. I'm just saying that overpromising and underdelivering, due to a lack of a broad understanding of AI research, can backfire, create distrust, and in the end slow science down, e.g., lead to another
81.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
In AI research, the acronym XAI stands for eXplainable AI [1]. To understand anything about the universe, AI will need to (i) make accurate predictions about some parts of the universe and (ii) explain the laws and the models it used to mak
82.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
When I was first reading about Musk, 12 years ago, I was extremely impressed, to the point of being ready to invest in Tesla and SolarCity. However, when Elon entered the AI space about 7 years ago it became clear to me that: (i) he is ente
83.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
Formal verification research is conducted since 30+ years and LLMs aren't really good at math and logic, so based on what grounds can we expect a breakthrough in machine guided proofs anytime soon?
84.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
So how will we know that it did?
85.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
Not just r/science. The hard part is that this logic applies also to "word/science" and to "world/society", and that this issue of belief confirmation will deepen until we learn to sufficiently value pub
86.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
You're fooling yourself to think that Tesla is the solution. First, most of the fatalities are in cars that cost much much less than Tesla. Their owners will never afford a Tesla. Second, the only realistic way to prevent some of these
87.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
If anything, Tesla was found to be deactivating the autopilot mode at the second before a crash [1], embellishing the statistics of miles driven between crashes... [1] PDF https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/inv/2022/
88.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
An there are no official investigations into Tesla crashes either? https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/inv/2022/INOA-EA22002-3184.PDF
89.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
> Marketing nonsense is standard Definitely, it will be standard, until we start pointing out lies.
90.
▲
by
pms
3y ago
Their "own" ideas? Let me remind you that OpenAI released a report purposefully suggesting that GPT4 has relatively high IQ, passes a lot of college-level tests, and solves coding problems. Then it was revealed that there was trai
More ›