pl-94

9 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by pl-94 8y ago

   Good to know thanks. It remains an immensely lower level than coal or fuel.
2. 62.▲
   by pl-94 8y ago

   A good benchmark for nuclear vs wind turbine is France (2nd country with the most installed nuclear power) and Danemark (Can run almost entirely on wind turbines). Well, France is producing about a factor of 2 or 3 less CO2 than Danemark. A
3. 63.▲
   by pl-94 8y ago

   Good point. Do you know many people died in Chernobyl? 31 during the accident. 11 since ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster ). Do you know many people died every year with fine particles? 2.1 millions.
4. 64.▲
   by pl-94 8y ago

   We are really far from solving the storage issue. And no nuclear is far from being cheaper than solar + lithium (except maybe in very specific area such as Chili with high sunlight and high cost of nuclear). There are not enough Lithium on
5. 65.▲
   Ask HN: What is a good project form for better accountability?

   1 points by pl-94 8y ago|0 comments
6. 66.▲
   Ask HN: How to find a marketing genius?

   1 points by pl-94 9y ago|0 comments
7. 67.▲
   by pl-94 10y ago

   France has one of the cheapest electricity price in Europe thanks to nuclear plants. The reactors were checked if they respect to new regulations from the post-Fukushima era.
8. 68.▲
   by pl-94 10y ago

   Unfortunately, we still need nuclear power: 1) Wind and solar are intermittent. Even if you produce more than what you consume, you still have to deal with the huge consumption peak of the evening. This is huge. No solution for now about it