pkstn

15 ms·

1. 151.▲
   by pkstn 7y ago

   Cool wow, yeah! I’ve thought about chat feature..
2. 152.▲
   by pkstn 7y ago

   Haha yeah, I was lucky to get that
3. 153.▲
   by pkstn 7y ago

   Others have requested chips too, so will add. But first need to open source
4. 154.▲
   by pkstn 7y ago

   I changed the design of faces, the previous font had too similar 3 and J
5. 155.▲
   by pkstn 7y ago

   I will open source it soon here: https://github.com/pakastin/deck-of-cards
6. 156.▲
   by pkstn 7y ago

   Fisher yates yeah! Server is the single-source-of-truth, so no way to peek cards
7. 157.▲
   by pkstn 7y ago

   Oh, just the deck without picked cards? I could add ”Collect” button next to ”Shuffle”. It’s easy to do, but I’m on mobile now – will do today.
8. 158.▲
   by pkstn 7y ago

   Oh damn, I’ll fix that ASAP
9. 159.▲
   by pkstn 7y ago

   node.js + express + MongoDB + socket.io
10. 160.▲
    by pkstn 7y ago

    I completely redesigned the card faces – 3 and J was hard to distinguish.. https://deck.of.cards
11. 161.▲
    by pkstn 7y ago

    Thanks! Here’s how they’re done: https://medium.com/@pakastin/javascript-playing-cards-part-3...
12. 162.▲
    by pkstn 7y ago

    Maybe, let’s see..
13. 163.▲
    by pkstn 7y ago

    Server is the single-source-of-truth and only share the info about card value/suit when clicking your own card or common cards
14. 164.▲
    by pkstn 7y ago

    Not possible, client-side doesn’t have the information
15. 165.▲
    by pkstn 7y ago

    It is done on server-side
16. 166.▲
    by pkstn 7y ago

    Yeah, that’s how it work! Will need to add help/tutorial there..
17. 167.▲
    by pkstn 7y ago

    I will open source it soon!
18. 168.▲
    Multiplayer Deck of Cards(deck.of.cards)

    190 points by pkstn 7y ago|73 comments
19. 169.▲
    Article about shuffling playing cards realistically with JavaScript(medium.com)

    1 points by pkstn 7y ago|0 comments
20. 170.▲
    by pkstn 7y ago

    Probably not for you then :) I was just looking for this kind of service myself, but couldn’t find.. Having solid price no matter the traffic and nice up-to-date vector map tiles.
21. 171.▲
    by pkstn 7y ago

    Good question! Answer is yes, and the difference is solid unmetered pricing! ;) Hosting the whole planet by yourself is not cheap either... Will start by offering nice and easily-stylable tiles, then search etc... And probably will have a f
22. 172.▲
    Would you prefer solid price vs. freemium model for vector maps?(mapsson.com)

    3 points by pkstn 7y ago|4 comments
23. 173.▲
    by pkstn 8y ago

    Check out my talk if you're interested in internals: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nh2EK1xveg&t=410s ;)
24. 174.▲
    by pkstn 8y ago

    It actually wasn’t, they didn’t use key with ng-repeat in benchmarks. Even Angular 1 was actually faster back then when used correctly: https://500tech.com/blog/all/is-reactjs-fast
25. 175.▲
    by pkstn 8y ago

    Agreed!
26. 176.▲
    by pkstn 8y ago

    But when I wrote that text, React used to be way slower than RE:DOM. It’s gotten faster since that (still slower though). I could probably update that ”marketing” text.
27. 177.▲
    by pkstn 8y ago

    The beauty is that you know exactly what’s happening and when. Debugging is also way easier without long stack traces. There’s pros and cons in everything.
28. 178.▲
    by pkstn 8y ago

    Not much, really..
29. 179.▲
    by pkstn 8y ago

    You can make pure updates in RE:DOM. It’s developed for our digital signage system, and it’s really performant in a real world situations. It’s different than React though, that’s by design, since we needed more precise DOM handling.
30. 180.▲
    by pkstn 8y ago

    Fair enough, of course it’s marketing as well. But it’s so common to say ”blazing fast”. Even FB developers argued React being fast even though it used to be really slow.