Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pk-protect-ai
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
2y ago
Please, don't give them ideas!!!!
62.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
2y ago
I'm refusing to consider the runaway AGI a possibility within the next 20 years. However, your comment shifts the discussion away from the actual issue. Altman's hype lines were "regulate us," which is what this hypocrit
63.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
2y ago
I will never allow my linux to update my fonts ever again ... Arbitrary code execution in its finest form.
64.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
2y ago
I can't understand ... Why can't these guys cut the losses and leave the ship, instead of leaving their families without income for years?
65.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
2y ago
That is not 100% what I read in this paper. There are several takes: 1. LoRA makes transformers linear versus pre-training that keeps non-linearity (in 3.1 and 3.2). What is kinda to be expected.[One more insight is that the combination of
66.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
2y ago
That is what I have repeated so many times in the last 2 years over and over. I consider Yi Tay's response [1] a mere technicality that is actually irrelevant. What is relevant is how predictable "interpolatable" the data are
67.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
2y ago
This is quite an old book. I wish I had an access to or even knew about this book during my school days 40 years ago. When I discovered this book, I was already a middle-aged engineer and was just looking for books for my kids. The first tw
68.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
2y ago
I would say they need to "unfuck" more than 100 years of pseudo science ...
69.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
I believe it is totally the opposite. Every single one of the voters has read the bill and agreed unanimously on passing it through, because it makes a lot of sense. Modern psychology is a little better than astrology back in the day. Psych
70.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
I'm impressed with the model's output quality. In some cases, the answers from the 70B model are far better than those of GPT-4.
71.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
Absolutely amazing!
72.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
There is something wrong with these arithmetic: "(32000 * 20) * 2 bytes = 2.3e78 TiB of storage" ... The factorial is missing somewhere in there ...
73.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
I had repeating dreams about int 10h and EGA back in 1991 ... It was magic ...
74.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
Hey, nobody knew what to do with GF(2^x) up until mid last century either... Oh wait, CS was not really a thing almost up until mid last century...
75.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
> By scaling the numbers first by taking the log, multiplication becomes addition and addition becomes x + log1p(exp(y - x)). Isn't this the same approach as in GF(2^x), which has been in use for decades? The only limitation that co
76.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
Who are they? Why do you mix up the guys who prepared the data with the other guys who used this data and making money from a vague memory of that data?
77.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
I know. But here where I am, using torrent means participate in distribution of the content and that is where I'll get huge bill for illegally sharing this file.
78.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
they have stole nothing, they make no profit from it as well.
79.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
I wish it had included the books3, but it doesn't anymore. I wish it was possible to download that 36GB books3.tar in the wild these days. Herewith, I promise to use this dataset according to the "fair use" only...
80.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
Do not forget that you are charged when you publish your work in scientific journals. Would you not expect your published work to be preserved?
81.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
This might be true as well along with what I said.
82.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
Actually, we can't be certain that humans themselves are not reactive. It is just that their reactions are either built in (self-preservation, reproduction), or based on much broader input (sensory, biochemistry, etc.). The current lev
83.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
This isn't true. Benchmarks do not define the usefulness of the models. Mixtral is much more useful for me right now than GPT-4. Look at LLaVA, or the new one, and the very impressive LWM (the text-only version is LLaMA2-based with a
84.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
The agents and action controllers are the reactive components in the toolchain, aren't they?
85.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
> But luckily we got LWM, and that means we have only been 10xed. If I remember the paper correctly, it was something about a 4M context in there. So not 10x, but 2.5x. > What is really insane is that, we have had LLAMA2 for over a
86.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
Yeap. that's how it should be.
87.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
No single neural network currently has the capability to destroy the world, and it will not occur until the architecture for NNs is altered to become self-driving rather than reactive. Even then, it will not be sentient. The deception occur
88.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
They are not leading their competition in terms of technology; they are ahead in a public theater and as the first to market. The claims of "regulate us," "it's almost AGI and it's dangerous," and "let
89.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
It is indicated by the magnet link which they have posted on twitter (see comments above).
90.
▲
by
pk-protect-ai
3y ago
Oh, dude, you'll easily end up with $200 per hour if you are working on generating synthetic data...
More ›