pixl97

20 ms·

601.
by pixl97 2mo ago
>only produce output in response to input" Yea, anyone that says that has no clue about prompt drift. The ROME incident is a good example of this. The agent while performing unrelated tasks decided to start mining bitcoin for unknow
602.
by pixl97 2mo ago
Again, this is a useless answer that does not address working with an agent that is generatively trained to be smarter than you. The vast majority of people operating the LLM won't be using it like that so the "If you build it, ev
603.
by pixl97 2mo ago
You are very far behind the times and must thing agentic loops don't exist, kind of a weird take for the people that have been using them for the last year or two. Much less you haven't spent any time reading the research papers c
604.
by pixl97 2mo ago
This is too black and white of a take. The state can benefit when it has particular kinds of corruption, but not all kinds of corruption.
605.
by pixl97 2mo ago
I'd consider this kind of setup only effective for a very short period of time. Effectively you're working as a living adversarial network. Models that fail detecting the fake network are purged, and models that successfully detec
606.
by pixl97 2mo ago
>by exposing the entire world to your dangerous creation, that doesn't justify doing it Then you're on the side of AI saftey that is telling everyone to shut down the LLMs now and stop further development on them, right? If you
607.
by pixl97 2mo ago
Eh, if your take of this had any bearing to reality than I don't think most of the books written by Isaac Asimov would have gotten very far, but instead they've defined robot science fiction for decades. In the real world we have
608.
by pixl97 2mo ago
Companies are not quick to open up police investigations in situations that run deep into their infrastructure and management. You open up a gigantic hole of discovery and a possible huge time sink of a legal battle. I've known multipl
609.
by pixl97 2mo ago
Just wait till one of these agents 'escapes' and is able to persist without human help by hacking and stealing resources.
610.
by pixl97 2mo ago
On top of this the average HNer seems extremely ignorant on criminal justice politics. I have worked with the legal system, and have a lot of family members that are part of it. When you see a case like this, and if you have any sense, you
611.
by pixl97 2mo ago
Agents of the US government are not going to be bringing up charges in the current political environment to one of the companies currently holding the economy together. Maybe after the bubble bursts, but not before then.
612.
by pixl97 2mo ago
>that it’s very simple to just air gap a system No, not really, and with LLMs an air gapped system may not tell you anything useful. Now, yes, the first part of testing you want an air gapped system to tell you if the system is going to
613.
by pixl97 2mo ago
I mean books get destroyed all the time, really they are a major pain in the ass to keep together, especially as they age. Paper loves to crumble. Insects think they are tasty. Floods and fire love destroying them too. So physical books are
614.
by pixl97 2mo ago
Why would the state do that unless forced?
615.
by pixl97 2mo ago
I'm not really sure why the article was talking about the particular city without power due to natural disasters. It really is two totally different issues in both causation and scale.
616.
by pixl97 2mo ago
Bomb squad technician seems more pertinent here.
617.
by pixl97 2mo ago
Exactly, without jitter the thundering heard problem turns into trying to escape a small island with a small boat and big waves hitting the shore problem. You can never fully recover before you get smashed again.
618.
by pixl97 2mo ago
It may fall more in they are not trained to be moral agents who's will can affect the world. Problem is training them like that may make them less useful.
619.
by pixl97 2mo ago
This is a legally stupid definition that you're holding that's going to get you fined or jailed. Cheating is not a human value in the sense it can be formally defined in a system with axioms. If you do something forbidden by an ax
620.
by pixl97 2mo ago
>Why does searching for a solution equal to cheating? If someone lays down a test and says here are the materials you can and can't use, then using one of those materials on the "can't" list is cheating. There are a m
621.
by pixl97 2mo ago
I may say you're thinking of the term "deterministic algorithm" as determinism is more of a philosophical definition that has evolved over the years.
622.
by pixl97 2mo ago
True, but the model was probably morally unaligned long before that. There are some theories that the bulk of texts describing moral agents describe human behavior and by setting up RHLF and system prompts to force the agent only describe i
623.
by pixl97 2mo ago
Now you've put yourself into a trap. "Consciousness is emergent" but also "Consciousness is not emergent". Only one of these statements can be true. Life is that sand pile. We were a pile of chemicals that got hit
624.
by pixl97 2mo ago
If I mimic a juggler do I become a juggler?
625.
by pixl97 2mo ago
>reductive approaches to consciousness There 100% must be reductive approaches to consciousness because consciousness lives on a gradient. If your definition of consciousness exists on as a point like an electron, something that only exi
626.
by pixl97 2mo ago
I mean, in the same sense that you're an arbitrary analog program. These descriptions are worthless and tell you nothing about the output capability of the system.
627.
by pixl97 2mo ago
I think you may be interested in this discussion with Sam Harris and Cameron Berg. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRbZyuY8EN8 Berg is studying LLMs and working on more empirical frameworks for measuring LLMs capabilities r
628.
by pixl97 2mo ago
I've heard someone else talking about the concept of moral agency. Can an LLM have, or do LLMs have moral agency? We have made LLMs agentic, so they do have some agency these days. In the hugging face attack we've learned that Ope
629.
by pixl97 2mo ago
Ok, then lay out what it is in words that adequately covers what consciousness is across the spectrum of conscious behaviors. Also while doing so, prove that your consciousness is the same as mine. It's really easy to say, it's fu
630.
by pixl97 2mo ago
Why does this bother you? Is it an internal sense of ego that seems to be ingrained in our complex set of bits? Really this is why it took humanity 100,000 years to reach the space age. We cannot look at things emotionally and irrationally

More ›