pixl97

50 ms·

331.
by pixl97 1mo ago
You seem to be missing the catch-22 situation here.
332.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Ehhhhhh. Its a golden era for one-man indie games that are successful. But this is deceptive. Per game delivered one man games were likely far far more successful in the past. Simply because there were very few of them in a much smaller mar
333.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Most people don't realize how tenuous the situation is with those open models too. Right now as long as they play along with Xi it's all good. But the moment something happens with them to upset the domestic peace, those open mode
334.
by pixl97 1mo ago
They have a right to privacy, but they don't have the right to your product.
335.
by pixl97 1mo ago
The libertarian types can be just as highly resistant to facts as any other political lean.
336.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Well in the ID scan leak wasn't there just a stream of data that was stolen? Deletion doesn't matter in that case.
337.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Define bad parenting? Should the state do nothing about children not being sent to school? Should they go hungry when not fed? Should we just throw the kids in jail instead of programs that provide support? The libertarian "eh whatever
338.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Chuckles, I'm in danger.
339.
by pixl97 1mo ago
The issue with reality is it runs in a massively parallel manner. You have to rank the concerns, yes, but the fact you can list the concerns proves they exist. Rich bastards fucking over your country are the biggest concern. The problem her
340.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Tell him to run now. Time to become a plumber at least for a bit.
341.
by pixl97 1mo ago
"Look at me, I collected a single data point, I am so SMRT. Fooled U suckers!" Please at least attempt to have a big more rigor in your standards.
342.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>- if SWE’s are fked so is everyone else! - Technical writers: It will never be me. [Oh no, it was me] - Graphics designers: It will never be me. [Oh no, it was me] - SWE: It will never be me. [Oh no, it was me] - everybody else: Haha, I
343.
by pixl97 1mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moravec%27s_paradox yea, but we'll see for sure.
344.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>appearance of rigor to the doomer religion. FFS. Please stop with the black and white thinking, the doomers and the e/acc people might as be the same person with a different colored hat with how uncritically they think. Doomers say
345.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Higher intelligence might be a million years old, probably a bit closer to 250,000 years or less. This is why we could build a calculator that could add better than us really easily. Muscular motive dexterity is closer to 500 million years
346.
by pixl97 1mo ago
There is no one such "recursive" that exists algorithmically. There are many. I mean in a simple loop you could have an AI driven compiler with a goal of producing an ever faster compiler. With it's newer faster compiler it c
347.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Sovereign AI is the term I've been seeing around self sustaining AI. The two hard(est) blockers on it currently are lack of computing hardware and model size. Once datacenters cover the earth it won't be any harder to steal GPU co
348.
by pixl97 1mo ago
As others have said AI output on this kind of this is 1. annoying. 2. useless. Anthropic, OpenAI, et al have a strong motivation to have their models that there is no possible way they could take over the world, aka "The police have in
349.
by pixl97 1mo ago
I mean I come here to read AI stuff myself, so its kind of a reverse preaching to the choir to me. For the most part the worst AI garbage gets filtered out in new, so ya downvotes are needed to keep out the crap, but it's up to the com
350.
by pixl97 1mo ago
No they are more about VC buying all the clinics and working them 24 hours a day and trying to extract as much money from the customer as possible.
351.
by pixl97 1mo ago
"concept of a plan"
352.
by pixl97 1mo ago
I see a recurring pattern here.
353.
by pixl97 1mo ago
We get it, your interests aren't the same as others. The problem here is you want your vote to count more than others because your interests are super important and everything, but that's not how upvote based sites on general tech
354.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Anyone with any karma can limit the flood by upvoting/down voting. And based on the number of dead submissions they do. I think part of the problem is people that like AI really like it and those that hate it really hate it. Hard to re
355.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Go to new, click down vote on every AI post. That is how we have less AI stuff on the front page. But if other people are interested in it and there are more of them than you then you might not get your way.
356.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Governments, especially the US government has got a taste of how good LLMs are at hacking. This is something that has typically been very hard to get enough people that are good at it and willing to do it for a state. Now they can spin up
357.
by pixl97 1mo ago
I mean I see this as very likely. When the world runs on digital infrastructure then having a nearly infinite collection of hackers that will work for you 24/7 without question makes you very powerful indeed. I really don't think
358.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Eh, ya I was not being negative on his views at all and he writes a lot of interesting things for sure. It was more of the outlook that his works attracted me because they touched on things I had seen glimpses of.
359.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Death cults that will kill you because of AI are the same group that will instill their values into the AI to ensure it kills it all.
360.
by pixl97 1mo ago
I mean half the US seems to be ran by death cults thinly disguised as religions. The fact this spills over into everything else is not surprising.

More ›