pixcavator

30 ms·

331.
by pixcavator 20y ago
I love the name.
332.
by pixcavator 20y ago
Good post! I think having a grand design ahead of time is good, if its a good design. To me, this is about the scientific approach vs the engineering approach. You can get in trouble with either one. Option one: you have your grand design
333.
Web 3.0(news.yahoo.com)
1 points by pixcavator 20y ago|0 comments
334.
by pixcavator 20y ago
What I meant is that you should base your decisions on your own situation, not statistics. You are likely to end up average anyway - that's the nature of statistics. If you don't, that shouldn't bother you..
335.
by pixcavator 20y ago
Makes sense to me. But my guess is that time would be an issue.
336.
by pixcavator 20y ago
That seems like a good idea. But what I think is missing in Photoshop is image analysis features. These features will allow you to take image editing to an entirely different level. This is a self-promotion, of course you can read about s
337.
by pixcavator 20y ago
I think "have the statistics work in your favor" means "be average".
338.
by pixcavator 20y ago
Lets look at this from the practical point of view. Even if these numbers are valid, would they change the way you start or run your business? No! The reason is that statistics is about the average and there is nothing average about you or
339.
by pixcavator 20y ago
We don't know how much is wired in the brain when a person is born and how much he learns and how. Generally, I don't think imitating nature ever works. You can experiment this way forever.
340.
by pixcavator 20y ago
These suggestions resemble a lot the advice given to new assistant professors on how to find time for research among all the teaching, committees, etc. Strange to find it here... But #4 is very relevant (no offense YC News!).
341.
Image mining(pixcavator.com)
2 points by pixcavator 20y ago|0 comments