pius

41 ms·

571.
SALT - Semantically Annotated LaTeX(salt.semanticauthoring.org)
2 points by pius 19y ago|0 comments
572.
JSON is YAML(redhanded.hobix.com)
5 points by pius 19y ago|5 comments
573.
Instant.js(netzgesta.de)
1 points by pius 19y ago|0 comments
574.
A Flickr-based Introduction to Ruby on Rails 2.0(devx.com)
1 points by pius 19y ago|0 comments
575.
by pius 19y ago
I hear you, but I'd be hard pressed to say that making all common sense knowledge machine readable is not a worthwhile direction.
576.
by pius 19y ago
Shite . . . that's scary!
577.
by pius 19y ago
The only part of Cyc I've looked at is OpenCyc and that was a few years ago when I was heavy into AI in college. I think it's a great effort!
578.
The Famous 2001 Article Outlining Tim Berners-Lee's Vision for the Semantic Web(sciam.com)
1 points by pius 19y ago|0 comments
579.
by pius 19y ago
It is machine-readable by an AI. The question is, where's the AI? ;)
580.
by pius 19y ago
This is great news for the Web. Very bad news for Twine though.
581.
by pius 19y ago
I guess something I do is using bleeding edge frameworks and libraries to start projects if I think it'll give me an advantage. I figure that they'll stabilize (or I can help stabilize them) in time for the production release of what ever
582.
by pius 19y ago
They steal domains?
583.
A small Rails site and why you should build one(awurl.com)
2 points by pius 19y ago|0 comments
584.
by pius 19y ago
But if you're old school, you'll have already had the old version (CLR) on your bookshelf collecting dust. ;)
585.
by pius 19y ago
"It takes all the hard work out of building database-driven Web sites. The secret is its 'scaffolding,' which provides all the basic Web functionality most sites will ever need. In effect, all you have to do is set up Rails, and then use th
586.
Integrating Scribd with your Rails application(bencurtis.com)
4 points by pius 19y ago|0 comments
587.
by pius 19y ago
All good, man.
588.
by pius 19y ago
I like the idea that low voted items naturally become hidden after a while. Maybe rather than a report spam button we could be able to hide links we don't want to see anymore.
589.
XMLBuilder: A Ruby DSL Case Study(codecommit.com)
3 points by pius 19y ago|0 comments
590.
by pius 19y ago
Let's see, I replied to someone's comment with a valid criticism. I just read the entirety of Zed's piece and, lo and behold, my argument against the comment still stands. (Whether or not Zed's protocol still stands is an open question.)
591.
by pius 19y ago
Have you even read the thread?
592.
by pius 19y ago
Being cryptic is bad -- in "secure code" and just about everywhere else. Unfortunately, that's not the point the commenter made at all. As to your praise of the notion that the author of an open, civilian protocol is making his protocol le
593.
by pius 19y ago
Ah, the Internet, where people act tough when they're safe behind their computer screens. You're really cool, getting so riled up about encryption schemes and commenting habits that you're typing swear words at me on a forum. <shaking
594.
A Sneak Peek at Github's Pricing Plan(github.com)
2 points by pius 19y ago|0 comments
595.
by pius 19y ago
I should be clear; I haven't read Zed's documentation and neither approve nor disapprove what he wrote. My reactions are strictly to the notion that a protocol creator shouldn't mention specifics in a security document -- that's flat out w
596.
by pius 19y ago
Perhaps; I couldn't speculate. To your point, though, a security protocol implementation document that makes use of secure hashes, encryption schemes, and the like isn't typically considered credible unless it states precisely what building
597.
by pius 19y ago
All due respect, but thinking that a system's security relies on people not knowing what ciphers and hash functions the system uses is on the top 3 list of signs that you're clueless about security. It'd be difficult to have made a more ir
598.
Develop a Firefox 3 Add-On, Get a Free T-Shirt(alex.polvi.net)
2 points by pius 19y ago|0 comments
599.
by pius 19y ago
I'm as impressed by this update as I was by the recent Safari release. FF3 is looking really good.
600.
Firefox 3 Beta 4 is 5x faster than IE7, 3x faster than FF2(blogs.zdnet.com)
7 points by pius 19y ago|2 comments

More ›