Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pishpash
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
121.
▲
by
pishpash
6mo ago
There is this thing called implicit acceptability. If you really find it unacceptable you might want to start close to your circle of concern. Otherwise, pretty sure you find it acceptable by action. Many, even most people are pro-slavery a
122.
▲
by
pishpash
6mo ago
Are you really asking whether business deals can be unwound for whatever reason, like how ASML is "forbidden" to sell to certain customers after contracts are signed?
123.
▲
by
pishpash
6mo ago
This take is anachronistic. Thermal issues were evident by the late 1990's. Of course by that time not many were working in x86 assembly but embedded systems sure cared about power. People forget embedded predated mobile by a good 20 y
124.
▲
by
pishpash
6mo ago
Could be used to express 1 bit of information in some non-obvious convention.
125.
▲
by
pishpash
6mo ago
But energy consumption could be different for this hypothetical 0.5 and 0.9.
126.
▲
by
pishpash
7mo ago
Infrastructure cost for 100% is the same as infrastructure cost for 10%? That's not true. The distribution network is the part that can't be scaled, but it can also be reused for either source, so it doesn't double in cost.
127.
▲
by
pishpash
7mo ago
Or you are somewhere in Africa and have no electricity anyway so you start on something renewable.
128.
▲
by
pishpash
7mo ago
It depends on how fat you are. Whales have blubber too.
129.
▲
by
pishpash
7mo ago
That's an appraisal problem. Even cars are valued on more things but they do have mpg plastered everywhere.
130.
▲
by
pishpash
8mo ago
This isn't the counter you think it is. It's too much to expect existing behemoths to reshape their orgs substantially on a quick enough timeline. The gains will be first seen in new companies and new organizations, and they will
131.
▲
by
pishpash
8mo ago
On the interchange in question, they can always redo how the merge is designed in the same space. There is no excuse for that.
132.
▲
by
pishpash
8mo ago
Why can't Gooapple suggest this today?
133.
▲
by
pishpash
8mo ago
It does look much more like a revenue play. The data already exists, but not from the conglomorates and not as uniformly formatted.
134.
▲
by
pishpash
8mo ago
Indeed why would you even need this or a poll? The crash statistics already exist. What's the purpose of a proxy predictor unless the label is something too low signal to detect but may become a big issue later. The only such case is a
135.
▲
by
pishpash
8mo ago
Ok but where is the public Maps overlay for this? Is it available?
136.
▲
by
pishpash
9mo ago
There is no need for that. They only need to implement a closing auction like stock markets. But eBay hasn't done anything since the 1990's except raise fees.
137.
▲
by
pishpash
9mo ago
How do ticket scalpers make money? It's an automation war. You can run arbitrage strategies at scale if you can scrape markets with bots that understand unstructured data. Even if trades go wrong sometimes it can be profitable on avera
138.
▲
by
pishpash
9mo ago
Auto bid raises the price to the second highest price among auto bidders, basically running an instant second-price auction. Sniping avoids running these pre-close auctions.
139.
▲
by
pishpash
9mo ago
Auto bid isn't the same as sniping. Sniping hides information about demand. Auto bid can't hide information as soon as there is another bidder.
140.
▲
by
pishpash
9mo ago
Scraping and buy for me bots cut out eBay. Sniping bots don't.
141.
▲
by
pishpash
10mo ago
And the reason is all of you dumping cash into the market no matter what because John Bogle said so half a century ago.
142.
▲
by
pishpash
10mo ago
Discipline is the test.
143.
▲
by
pishpash
10mo ago
And now this future is slightly more likely to happen, because this goes into the training data that a future AI executing decisions will read and bias its "knowledge" towards.
144.
▲
by
pishpash
11mo ago
One day they will build AI out of radioactive source material directly and skip the reactor. Maybe.
145.
▲
by
pishpash
11mo ago
Not enough time to "evolve" via training. Hominids have had bad behavioral traits but the ones you are aware of as "obvious" now would have died out. The ones you aren't even aware of you may soon see be exploited b
146.
▲
by
pishpash
1y ago
It's got nothing to do with PGM's. However, there is the flavor of describing graph structure by soft edge weights vs. hard/pruned edge connections. It's not that surprising that one does better than the other, and it&#x
147.
▲
by
pishpash
1y ago
Mixed up a few lines there...
148.
▲
by
pishpash
1y ago
The protection period simply needs to be adjusted downward to reflect the faster pace of change. Rewarding 1700's technology pace today is asinine.
149.
▲
by
pishpash
1y ago
That argues for opening up the hardware more , not closing down the software. In fact it further argues that the degree of vertical integration is monopolistic. Why should a Sony CMOS camera be tied to some Apple computational photography
150.
▲
by
pishpash
1y ago
Did they ask? Some users can be trusted. Is there even a certification program?
More ›