Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pintxo
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
This being Germany, you actually are supposed to register every panel in a central database. So the utilities know where generation is happening. This is for proper solar installs as well as for balcony solar. I have a proper setup on my ro
32.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
You loose performance at noon/summer, when you are likely to produce over your demand anyway. But during winter/rainy days, when you are limited to diffuse light, they deliver the same output. The point is that panels are so dead
33.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
Well, if you have tests with 100+ lines of such explicitness, it becomes really hard to see the high level picture of „what is tested here“. As usually, there is a balance to be found.
34.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
Germany, and these are numbers from our gas heater. But the house is almost 50 years old and not insulated to current standards (yet). We got a heatpump this year, going to be interesting to see how this changes things.
35.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
To be fair, the US governments of the last 25 years have all been contributing to the current state of affairs in terms of eroding the rule of (international) law.
36.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
Really like the idea, but my house alone has roughly 16 MWh/a heat consumption. Of which half gets consumed November through January. So this system could supply 12 houses? Shows the importance of proper insulation, which is still on o
37.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
Cooling needs tend to correlate with the availability of solar energy. While heating especially far north does not so much.
38.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
Because they are not atomic bodies?
39.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
If only 10 out of 100 of your investments make it, does it matter if one of the 90 failed because of lacking backups? Their risk strategy is diversification of investments. Not making each investment itself bulletproof.
40.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
Nice analogy!
41.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
I don’t see any need for that. There are enough weirdos in politics today that the weirdo rate might even go down when selecting people at random.
42.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
This training thingy sounds sensible. But who controls the contents of the training? That body will have quite some power.
43.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
Given that legalese is still commonly prone to interpretation. I‘d rather have more Mathematics and Computer science people to ensure proper logic in the texts ;-)
44.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
„You keep am stupid, I keep them poor“, said the king to the bishop.
45.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
If SpaceX had to distribute their spending like NASA across states/senators/political influence, I doubt they would be anywhere near were they are today. I wouldn’t call this a failure of public science/research/developm
46.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
I assume, when people dismiss it, they are not looking at it through the business lens and the 100m user signups KPI, but they are dismissing it on technical grounds, as an LLM is just a very big statistical database which seems incapable o
47.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
What could possibly go wrong making education a for-profit business? /s
48.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
If that’s true, can we agree to slap on a 10% tax on every AI company’s revenue? To account for the externalities?
49.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
If people of the past would have followed that argument, we would not have seen the declaration of human rights of the French Revolution, not have had the civil war, slaves might still be slaves. Hitler’s successors would reign Europe. Some
50.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
One 1-2k/year seems rather cheap to treat an ongoing chronic illness? As asthma will be an ongoing problem when started?
51.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
Germany are also very risk averse. So we need such programs even just to counter this risk aversion.
52.
▲
by
pintxo
1y ago
It‘s the worst ideas together, but the alternative is even worse? That does not make any sense, logically. But I guess this summarizes the current situation quite nicely.
53.
▲
by
pintxo
2y ago
Yeah, everyone is talking about free markets. But no one likes the idea of a transparent market.
54.
▲
by
pintxo
2y ago
> Nothing to stop them turning around the next day and changing their interpretation again. Why describes mostly every law enacted by a parliament? They clearly have that power to change the laws they enacted at any time. So where is the
55.
▲
by
pintxo
2y ago
I was merely replying to the parent post. I would be massively irritated if the White House would not have multiple levels of redundancy. Which makes the article just more confusing.
56.
▲
by
pintxo
2y ago
Sounds like good technology / business practice? I run two independent (Technology + Provider wise) internet links for our house, as both my SO and myself are permanently working from home.
57.
▲
by
pintxo
2y ago
The legitimate interest that there does not exist a tool that allows any random person to create art in the same style as she does? Which could arguably devalue their offering?
58.
▲
by
pintxo
2y ago
Did you encounter any instances of hallucinations or omissions? One would image those to be the biggest dangers.
59.
▲
by
pintxo
2y ago
Actually, water is scarce in some parts of Germany [1], it might not look like it, but there are still drought conditions in the soil of some parts of Germany [2]. [1] https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/themen/wasser/e
60.
▲
by
pintxo
2y ago
It is a common model in Germany, together with city/state owned companies. The latter have often be privatized in the early 2000s, unfortunately.
More ›