Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pimterry
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
151.
▲
by
pimterry
3y ago
I moved to Mega recently, who now have a very tidy full E2EE cloud storage dropbox equivalent: https://mega.io/storage . No affiliation, but it does exactly what you're asking for, and I've been very happy with it.
152.
▲
Barcelona Supercomputing Center presents Sargantana: new open-source RISC-V chip
(bsc.es)
375 points
by
pimterry
3y ago
|
156 comments
153.
▲
The Temporal API Is Awesome
(taro.codes)
2 points
by
pimterry
3y ago
|
0 comments
154.
▲
by
pimterry
3y ago
Some interesting past discussion on the raw RFC itself: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27729610
155.
▲
Working with the New Idempotency Keys RFC
(httptoolkit.com)
1 points
by
pimterry
3y ago
|
1 comments
156.
▲
by
pimterry
3y ago
In general, yes, a user on any mastodon instance can access any other - they are not siloed. Even further: a user on a mastodon instance can see & interact with posts on Lemmy (the Reddit alternative), pics on Pixelfed (=Instagram), vid
157.
▲
OpenAPI for Everybody
(httptoolkit.com)
2 points
by
pimterry
3y ago
|
0 comments
158.
▲
by
pimterry
3y ago
> We need some laws to swing our way; enshrine our rights to privacy in clear terms so implementing laws like chat control become a non-starter. I think those are already in place - one major point against the previously suggested approa
159.
▲
by
pimterry
3y ago
Couldn't you replace it with another USB-C though? Then you'd always have an extra USB you can use for stuff!
160.
▲
by
pimterry
3y ago
Why on earth have they shipped with a USB-C that you can charge from _and_ a barrel charging connector? Article says exactly the same power delivery on both. Anybody know what's going on there? Why not drop the barrel and put something
161.
▲
by
pimterry
3y ago
The toughening discussed in that article entirely applies to protections for children themselves on social media - requiring limits to stop them seeing harmful content. An interesting debatable question, but not related to the encryption &a
162.
▲
Technical Standards Bodies Are Regulators
(mnot.net)
4 points
by
pimterry
3y ago
|
1 comments
163.
▲
Ofcom's new guidance on open Internet / net neutrality
(decoded.legal)
1 points
by
pimterry
3y ago
|
0 comments
164.
▲
by
pimterry
3y ago
They just opened "Framework for Business" recently: https://frame.work/framework-for-business
165.
▲
New ways to inject system CA certificates in Android 14
(httptoolkit.com)
4 points
by
pimterry
3y ago
|
0 comments
166.
▲
by
pimterry
3y ago
From the spec ( https://github.com/WICG/compression-dictionary-transport#fin... ): > The existence of a dictionary is effectively a cookie for any requests that match it and should be treated as such: > * Storage p
167.
▲
by
pimterry
3y ago
This is overly reductive. All software - including Linux and vim - makes some choices that benefit the developer over the user. Any choice of technology or software architecture with consideration of developer ergonomics is doing this. Ever
168.
▲
New ways to inject system CA certificates in Android 14
(httptoolkit.com)
4 points
by
pimterry
3y ago
|
0 comments
169.
▲
We Are Not Sustainable
(frame.work)
3 points
by
pimterry
3y ago
|
0 comments
170.
▲
Building a DIY Steam Deck from recycled Framework laptop parts [video]
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
pimterry
3y ago
|
0 comments
171.
▲
by
pimterry
3y ago
It's great to see people moving in this direction, but I'm disappointed that everybody has decided to reimplement basically the same thing independently. Mobx was ahead of the game here (though, granted, it too draws on Knockout.j
172.
▲
by
pimterry
3y ago
To be fair, the article suggests early on that sometimes these plans are being processed for flights already in the air (although at least 4 hours away from the UK). If you can stop the specific problematic plane taking off then keeping the
173.
▲
End-to-End Encryption on the Web: Isolating Plaintext
(emilymstark.com)
3 points
by
pimterry
3y ago
|
0 comments
174.
▲
by
pimterry
3y ago
Some interesting background on why Next.js's middleware doesn't support Node.js on GH here: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/46722 This feels like somewhere where you can really see the
175.
▲
Next.js, Just Why?
(pilcrow.vercel.app)
4 points
by
pimterry
3y ago
|
1 comments
176.
▲
Every software project is a startup that will probably fail
(muldoon.cloud)
130 points
by
pimterry
3y ago
|
69 comments
177.
▲
by
pimterry
3y ago
This seems bizarre to me, as this isn't astroturfing at all - it's a marketing post on the official company blog! There's no suggestion whatsoever that this is coming from raw grassroots enthusiasm. This is clearly marketing
178.
▲
by
pimterry
3y ago
No - the system cert installation works out of the box on Google's own official emulators, for both AOSP & 'Play Services' editions (but not Play Store). Ditto for Genymotion, Bluestacks, etc. Zero root setup required in
179.
▲
by
pimterry
3y ago
I don't think that helps much unfortunately. That's a java.lang.System property (i.e. a config value set within one JVM/app) as opposed to an android.os.SystemProperties OS property (globally configurable on the device via ad
180.
▲
by
pimterry
3y ago
The crux is that previously any user could modify these certs directly, even on vanilla OS images from Google themselves, without installing any tools at all - just by writing to disk - and that's both widely used and included in the s
More ›