pimterry

67 ms·

781.
by pimterry 7y ago
Hmm, no idea. I'm using Chrome on a Mac, and it works fine, and my analytics suggest at least 400 other Chrome+Mac users have been getting through, so it's not a general problem... Any chance you can export a HAR from your browser
782.
by pimterry 7y ago
As a UI desktop app, not really, although it depends what you're trying to do. However, the internals are all open-source too, so you can use them standalone and automate HTTP & HTTPS with that. Take a look at https://gi
783.
by pimterry 7y ago
> Does that not require a system-level root CA to be installed and trusted? No, happily :-) The trick is that it starts the application to be intercepted for you, so it can control it a little. It then does some magic to get that specifi
784.
by pimterry 7y ago
HTTP Toolkit can definitely intercept Android & iOS or other network devices, it just can't do it for you automatically (yet. Watch this space: https://github.com/httptoolkit/feedback/issues/10 ). If
785.
by pimterry 7y ago
Huh, that shouldn't happen! What browser & OS are you using?
786.
by pimterry 7y ago
It has all the same core functionality, plus: - It's open-source - It's cross-platform - It can do all the interception setup for you, for a single specific target. Fiddler et al set the system proxy, so there's a lot of othe
787.
by pimterry 7y ago
HTTP Toolkit is fully open source, primarily AGPL: https://github.com/httptoolkit/ . That includes the Pro version too - it's not open core, it's just open source all the way down. There are other tools that e
788.
by pimterry 7y ago
Hey HN! I've been building this for a while, but up until now it's been a read-only HTTP debugging tool, and today's my first foray into proper mocking, which opens up a whole new world of fun (and practical use cases). Let m
789.
Show HN: HTTP Mock – Intercept, debug and mock HTTP(S) with zero setup(httptoolkit.tech)
341 points by pimterry 7y ago|84 comments
790.
A Software Security Field Guide for the Bewildered(zwischenzugs.com)
2 points by pimterry 7y ago|0 comments
791.
TypeScript 3.7: The 5 Big Features and How to Use Them(httptoolkit.tech)
2 points by pimterry 7y ago|0 comments
792.
by pimterry 7y ago
Looks from the github repos like this is MacOS only right now, is that right? I'm guessing mostly based on https://github.com/gitduckhq/aperture-node . If you're running in VS Code though I think you might be
793.
by pimterry 7y ago
What? The data that you've visited a mental health support website plus your IP easily takes you into GDPR sensitive data territory, and the rules around this are super strict: https://gdpr-info.eu/art-9-gdpr/ . Yo
794.
by pimterry 7y ago
One of the team behind this research posted an interesting walk-through of the traffic from one of the worst offenders: https://twitter.com/Bendineliot/status/1169259912184115206
795.
by pimterry 7y ago
Unfortunately, the google calendar option doesn't actually reject invitations or really remove them from your calendar, it just hides them for you . If you're sharing your calendar with anybody then they're still visible to
796.
Mental Health for Sale(privacyinternational.org)
2 points by pimterry 7y ago|0 comments
797.
by pimterry 7y ago
If you're struggling with TypeScript + React, check out the React TypeScript Cheatsheets: https://github.com/typescript-cheatsheets/react-typescript-c... There's even a specific one on how to type HOCs: http
798.
Web Concepts: collecting and linking the specifications of the web(webconcepts.info)
2 points by pimterry 7y ago|0 comments
799.
Show HN: React Reverse Portals(github.com)
1 points by pimterry 7y ago|0 comments
800.
by pimterry 7y ago
> Binary protocols ARE easier than JSON. I'm counting everything involved in handling JSON, and you may not be; Lexing, parsing, and so on. Those things simply don't exist in binary. they add weight to code that simply doesn&#x
801.
What Color Is Your Function?(journal.stuffwithstuff.com)
2 points by pimterry 7y ago|0 comments
802.
by pimterry 7y ago
I think its been exacerbated significantly by the reporting elsewhere: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/08/skype... Notably, according to that Ars Technica coverage: > attackers could ba
803.
by pimterry 7y ago
I'm unclear about how this attack works. The article says: > attackers could backdoor applications and then redistribute them Most distribution mechanisms however ship a single signed bundle, containing & thereby signing the ent
804.
by pimterry 7y ago
> How do you ensure people will install the certificate? I think the short answer is: your internet won't work until you do. VPNs out of the country avoid this of course; not clear if they're working to actively block that.
805.
by pimterry 7y ago
When you say: > we got the free Internet, the government got an instrument for fighting digital weapons I'm not sure what this means. What is the instrument the government now has for fighting digital weapons? Is it the ability to t
806.
by pimterry 7y ago
Interesting, but purely US focused. Anybody have good data on progress in the rest of the world?
807.
by pimterry 7y ago
This is both really interesting, and excellent advice. I've been working on exactly this myself, and while I'm lucky enough to have found an initial handful of customers from the classic blind selling of my product, it's ridi
808.
by pimterry 7y ago
Very cool! Are there details anywhere on how this works?
809.
by pimterry 7y ago
The Guardian made a helpful infographic a little while back about exactly this: https://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2...
810.
by pimterry 7y ago
I set up code signing for an electron app relatively recently. Best option I could find was Digicert. Really sucks that this stuff is necessary nowadays and not free, but it's not so bad. That's for Windows - for Mac you'll a

More ›